Timeline for Is a judge's completely arbitrary determination of credibilty subject to appeal?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 18 at 12:10 | comment | added | civitas | So, does the appeal court have the transcript at hand, does the quality and veracity of the court reporter matter (they are a sort of tryer of facts from omissions, commissions and misperceptions and then held as factual) does the reporters previous history become an appealable matter? | |
S Jun 18 at 2:40 | history | suggested | Tim | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Reword the "sexual history" example to clarify it is not a legal basis to discredit a complainant.
|
Jun 18 at 2:36 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Jun 18 at 2:40 | |||||
Jun 17 at 17:21 | comment | added | lgshost | Ok thanks. I've made it a separate question law.stackexchange.com/questions/103332/… | |
Jun 17 at 16:47 | comment | added | lgshost | Thank you for your detailed and wonderful response. Is there appealability for a judge who decides to interpret testimony a particular way where it is unclear that the witness actually meant that? For example, the witness testifies that "I own blue plants", but the judge interprets that as "I wear blue pants" when in reality the witness says later that her blue pants have been in storage since the 70s. | |
Jun 17 at 15:59 | history | edited | Jen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 395 characters in body
|
Jun 17 at 15:50 | history | edited | Jen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
made more general to cross jurisdictions
|
Jun 17 at 14:37 | history | edited | Jen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1803 characters in body
|
Jun 17 at 13:02 | history | edited | Jen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
Jun 17 at 12:41 | history | answered | Jen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |