Skip to main content
deleted 1 character in body
Source Link
bbzz
  • 169
  • 1
  • 6

As Dale M have said in previous answer, the people conducting arbitration does not have obligation to publish the result to public. Or even worse, arbitration clauses usually also contain non disclosure agreement which makes it illegal for anyone participating in the arbitration to talk about the arbitration result in the public, including when the result is unfair and unjust due to the fact that arbitrator are hired by the company and is afraid of losing their job if they make decision that does not favor the company. This shield the company from reputational damage that may arise from the victim publishing unfair arbitration result to internet, because they are not allowed to publish it in the first place due to non disclosure agreement.

As quoted from President Biden [1] :

Forced arbitration isn’t court. In fact, forced arbitration prevents survivors from going to court. And under forced arbitration, proceedings are conducted in secret, often by arbitrators selected and paid for by the employer.

And the outcomes of the arbitration are usually hidden from the public and the employees and coworkers, and they usually can’t even — and they can’t be appealed or can’t be overturned., and they usually can’t even — and they can’t be appealed or can’t be overturned.

In some arbitration clauses, you can’t even acknowledge that you’re bringing the claim. And parenthetically, employees can still forbid — can still forbid — employers can still forbid people from talking about what happened to them through nondisclosure clauses. And I think that should be changed as well, but that’s another day.

As Dale M have said in previous answer, the people conducting arbitration does not have obligation to publish the result to public. Or even worse, arbitration clauses usually also contain non disclosure agreement which makes it illegal for anyone participating in the arbitration to talk about the arbitration result in the public, including when the result is unfair and unjust due to the fact that arbitrator are hired by the company and is afraid of losing their job if they make decision that does not favor the company. This shield the company from reputational damage that may arise from the victim publishing unfair arbitration result to internet, because they are not allowed to publish it in the first place due to non disclosure agreement.

As quoted from President Biden [1] :

Forced arbitration isn’t court. In fact, forced arbitration prevents survivors from going to court. And under forced arbitration, proceedings are conducted in secret, often by arbitrators selected and paid for by the employer.

And the outcomes of the arbitration are usually hidden from the public and the employees and coworkers, and they usually can’t even — and they can’t be appealed or can’t be overturned.

In some arbitration clauses, you can’t even acknowledge that you’re bringing the claim. And parenthetically, employees can still forbid — can still forbid — employers can still forbid people from talking about what happened to them through nondisclosure clauses. And I think that should be changed as well, but that’s another day.

As Dale M have said in previous answer, the people conducting arbitration does not have obligation to publish the result to public. Or even worse, arbitration clauses usually also contain non disclosure agreement which makes it illegal for anyone participating in the arbitration to talk about the arbitration result in the public, including when the result is unfair and unjust due to the fact that arbitrator are hired by the company and is afraid of losing their job if they make decision that does not favor the company. This shield the company from reputational damage that may arise from the victim publishing unfair arbitration result to internet, because they are not allowed to publish it in the first place due to non disclosure agreement.

As quoted from President Biden [1] :

Forced arbitration isn’t court. In fact, forced arbitration prevents survivors from going to court. And under forced arbitration, proceedings are conducted in secret, often by arbitrators selected and paid for by the employer.

And the outcomes of the arbitration are usually hidden from the public and the employees and coworkers, and they usually can’t even — and they can’t be appealed or can’t be overturned.

In some arbitration clauses, you can’t even acknowledge that you’re bringing the claim. And parenthetically, employees can still forbid — can still forbid — employers can still forbid people from talking about what happened to them through nondisclosure clauses. And I think that should be changed as well, but that’s another day.

Source Link
bbzz
  • 169
  • 1
  • 6

As Dale M have said in previous answer, the people conducting arbitration does not have obligation to publish the result to public. Or even worse, arbitration clauses usually also contain non disclosure agreement which makes it illegal for anyone participating in the arbitration to talk about the arbitration result in the public, including when the result is unfair and unjust due to the fact that arbitrator are hired by the company and is afraid of losing their job if they make decision that does not favor the company. This shield the company from reputational damage that may arise from the victim publishing unfair arbitration result to internet, because they are not allowed to publish it in the first place due to non disclosure agreement.

As quoted from President Biden [1] :

Forced arbitration isn’t court. In fact, forced arbitration prevents survivors from going to court. And under forced arbitration, proceedings are conducted in secret, often by arbitrators selected and paid for by the employer.

And the outcomes of the arbitration are usually hidden from the public and the employees and coworkers, and they usually can’t even — and they can’t be appealed or can’t be overturned.

In some arbitration clauses, you can’t even acknowledge that you’re bringing the claim. And parenthetically, employees can still forbid — can still forbid — employers can still forbid people from talking about what happened to them through nondisclosure clauses. And I think that should be changed as well, but that’s another day.