Timeline for Wouldn't the ban of TikTok violate freedom of speech?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10 at 0:50 | comment | added | bdb484 | Note that the D.C. Circuit has decided this question. The court concludes that the law is a restriction on TikTok's speech -- albeit a permissible one. TikTok Inc. v. Garland, No. 24-1113, 26 (D.C. Cir. Dec. 6, 2024) (“The Act plainly singles out that expressive activity by indirectly subjecting TikTok - and so far, only TikTok - to the divestiture requirement.”). | |
| S Nov 28 at 12:22 | history | mod moved comments to chat | |||
| S Nov 28 at 12:22 | comment | added | Pat W.♦ | Comments have been moved to chat; please do not continue the discussion here. | |
| Nov 26 at 15:44 | history | edited | Trish | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 17 characters in body
|
| Nov 26 at 15:41 | history | rollback | Trish |
Rollback to Revision 3
|
|
| Nov 26 at 15:39 | history | edited | jcaron | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Nov 26 at 12:34 | history | edited | Trish | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 124 characters in body
|
| Nov 26 at 7:49 | history | edited | Trish | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 26 characters in body
|
| Nov 26 at 7:40 | history | answered | Trish | CC BY-SA 4.0 |