Timeline for Does the "natural born Citizen" requirement for presidency violate the ICERD?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 22:23 | comment | added | Dan | The fact that the constitution prevails doesn't mean that the conflict doesn't matter. Countries may be subjected to penalties under a treaty mechanism because they are domestically incapable of implementing the terms of a treaty they've signed. In WTO law, for instance, the fact that your constitution prevents you from implementing your commitments is no excuse, you'll still be subject to whatever remedies are available. | |
| Jul 19, 2016 at 23:58 | comment | added | Insane | That isn't what was asked: "Which is more supreme." What was asked was do they conflict, the answer is yes, but it doesn't matter because the constitution will always supersede.. | |
| Jul 19, 2016 at 20:09 | history | answered | user6726 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |