Timeline for Do warranty disclaimers in software licenses carry any legal weight?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 5, 2016 at 21:56 | comment | added | jimsug | @Rhymoid while that may be true in some cases, it is definitely not always the case. Courts will look at the "heart" or the nature of the agreement, and have variously found that software is and isn't a good - it really depends on the facts, so you can't make this claim without qualifying it. Two such examples: A good - not a good | |
Nov 5, 2016 at 21:24 | comment | added | Rhymoid | Software itself is not tangible property, and is therefore not a good. | |
Sep 17, 2016 at 7:18 | comment | added | jimsug | @PhilippeOmbredanne ... that's fine, but I don't assert that in my answer. I added information in response to the above comments. | |
Sep 15, 2016 at 13:27 | comment | added | Philippe Ombredanne | @jimsug open source software is not really a gift IMHO as there is no active "giving" on the part of the author. The software is just made available for free under an open source license. | |
Jul 28, 2015 at 23:48 | history | edited | jimsug | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
gifts are covered under ACL
|
Jul 28, 2015 at 23:41 | history | edited | Dale M♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Expanded Australian section with additional information
|
Jul 28, 2015 at 18:42 | vote | accept | Martijn | ||
Jul 28, 2015 at 12:04 | history | edited | jimsug | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
finished writing my answer and added definition to body of answer
|
Jul 28, 2015 at 11:00 | comment | added | jimsug | @Martijn I've added some information about gifts. | |
Jul 28, 2015 at 10:46 | history | edited | jimsug | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added some case law
|
Jul 28, 2015 at 10:01 | comment | added | Martijn | Do I understand correctly that 2-314 and 2-315 don't count for software that is given away for free, and not sold, as is often (but not always!) the case? | |
Jul 28, 2015 at 9:48 | history | answered | jimsug | CC BY-SA 3.0 |