Timeline for What actions are still crimes even if the victim gives consent?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 13:00 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://law.stackexchange.com/ with https://law.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Oct 29, 2016 at 12:49 | comment | added | Peter Point | @user6726 Just like in R v. Brown (or Browne), late 1980's or early 90's, where the 'victim's' consent to having a certain part of his body nailed to a plank of wood (sexual sadomasochistic activities) by a third-party, was held, as a matter of public policy, not to have been a vitiating factor in the commission of whatever the offence against the person was (pun intended) in that case. | |
| Oct 29, 2016 at 8:28 | comment | added | Dale M♦ | @user6726 feel free to answer the question you see, I'll answer the one I see | |
| Oct 28, 2016 at 20:57 | comment | added | user6726 | It is clear that the OP simply misworded the question as "other crimes that the victim cannot consent to, in order to prevent them being a crime", when "actions" was what was intended. The actual question is about acts ("against" a person) where the act is still defined as a crime even when consent is given. Like killing a person not under color of law. | |
| Oct 28, 2016 at 20:29 | history | answered | Dale M♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |