Timeline for Is Steve Bannon's Navy Personnel file protected information and if so, does USA Today bear legal culpability for obtaining and publishing it?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2017 at 20:34 | history | edited | user0306 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 173 characters in body
|
| Feb 9, 2017 at 20:33 | comment | added | user0306 | @NateEldredge - That's true. I don't think their wording implies that but it's not impossible. | |
| Feb 9, 2017 at 19:57 | answer | added | ohwilleke | timeline score: 4 | |
| Feb 9, 2017 at 19:38 | comment | added | Nate Eldredge | Of course, it's conceivable that Bannon himself gave the file to USA Today, or consented to its publication. | |
| Feb 9, 2017 at 19:36 | comment | added | Nate Eldredge | Yeah, you can't steal information. And unlike the Pentagon Papers, I don't suppose Bannon's file is classified. It can't be libel if it's accurate. The only legal problem I can think of is invasion of privacy, but public figures have much less protection in that regard. | |
| Feb 9, 2017 at 19:32 | history | edited | Nate Eldredge | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fix spelling in title
|
| Feb 9, 2017 at 18:35 | history | edited | user0306 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Feb 9, 2017 at 18:32 | history | asked | user0306 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |