While reading through an album booklet I came across a scenario where the artist, Lana Del Rey had a copyright under the exclusive license ofto sed record company. From an ownership perspective how does this work?
Bonus: Is there a difference between the terms under the exclusive license of and under the exclusive license to? I've seen this on a few occasions and was just wondering if this was a matter of phrasing.
While reading through an album booklet I came across a scenario where the artist, Lana Del Rey had a copyright under the exclusive license of sed record company. From an ownership perspective how does this work?
Bonus: Is there a difference between the terms under the exclusive license of and under the exclusive license to? I've seen this on a few occasions and was just wondering if this was a matter of phrasing.
While reading through an album booklet I came across a scenario where the artist, Lana Del Rey had a copyright under exclusive license to sed record company. From an ownership perspective how does this work?
Bonus: Is there a difference between the terms under the exclusive license of and under the exclusive license to? I've seen this on a few occasions and was just wondering if this was a matter of phrasing.
While reading through an album booklet I came across a scenario where the artist, Lana Del Rey had a copyright under the exclusive license of sed record company. From an ownership perspective how does this work?
Bonus: Is there a difference between the terms under the exclusive license of and under the exclusive license to? I've seen this on a few occasions and was just wondering if this was a matter of phrasing.
