Timeline for Hypothetically walking the line between pornography and prostitution
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2017 at 23:55 | answer | added | D M | timeline score: 7 | |
| Dec 19, 2017 at 1:59 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Nov 19, 2017 at 1:37 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Oct 20, 2017 at 1:27 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Sep 20, 2017 at 0:37 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Aug 20, 2017 at 23:41 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jul 21, 2017 at 23:23 | answer | added | A.fm. | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 21, 2017 at 22:57 | comment | added | gen-ℤ ready to perish | @A.fm. You most certainly correct. I wonder how they would undertake prosecution since custom pornography and porn directors including themselves are not unheard of—especially if this hypothetical studio were to produce films that did not include the customer. Perchance you’d care to explore it in an answer? | |
| Jul 21, 2017 at 22:53 | comment | added | A.fm. | In all likelihood, if authorities caught wind of a ploy like this and somehow verified (an interesting and unique undercover operation for someone on the force?) it was a prostitution ring, they would shut it down and prosecute it the same way they would any other ring or brothel. It’s hard to imagine they would be powerless when the only difference is a camera and a customer-written “script.” | |
| Jul 21, 2017 at 6:44 | history | edited | gen-ℤ ready to perish | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
changed “federal legislation” to “constitutional law”
|
| Jul 21, 2017 at 6:35 | comment | added | gen-ℤ ready to perish | @user6726 I will try to research this specifically and update the post with any relevant information. Thank you for posing a good point/question, I very much appreciate it :) | |
| Jul 21, 2017 at 5:09 | comment | added | user6726 | I doubt Texas is particularly special in this respect. This raises the interesting question of whether anyone has been arrested for such a ploy, and what was the disposition? Alternatively, has there anywhere and ever (when was the last time?) been at attempt to shut down porn-filming not as obscenity, but specifically because the act fits a definition of prostitution? | |
| Jul 21, 2017 at 5:00 | comment | added | gen-ℤ ready to perish | @user6726 Yes, exactly. | |
| Jul 21, 2017 at 5:00 | comment | added | user6726 | Can we assume when you say "federal legislation exempts pornography from state legislation", you meant "American constitutional law?" | |
| Jul 21, 2017 at 0:51 | history | edited | gen-ℤ ready to perish | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body; deleted 1 character in body
|
| Jul 20, 2017 at 22:28 | history | asked | gen-ℤ ready to perish | CC BY-SA 3.0 |