Timeline for When stolen property is illegally seized, must it be returned to the party which stole it?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2018 at 6:00 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jun 30, 2018 at 5:06 | answer | added | ohwilleke | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jun 29, 2018 at 2:16 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| May 30, 2018 at 6:42 | comment | added | phoog | @RonBeyer the court has no burden of proof. | |
| May 30, 2018 at 2:02 | answer | added | Dale M♦ | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 29, 2018 at 21:49 | comment | added | Ron Beyer | Not being convicted of a crime (or having the conviction overturned on a technicality) doesn't mean you can keep the fruits of that crime. Worst case this could be turned into a civil suit where the court has a lesser "burden of proof". I believe (although not sure what statues agree with me) that the property would be returned to the last person who can prove legal ownership (which may or may not be the person who's name is on the title). | |
| May 29, 2018 at 20:46 | review | First posts | |||
| May 29, 2018 at 23:12 | |||||
| May 29, 2018 at 20:42 | history | asked | Andrew Jay | CC BY-SA 4.0 |