Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 26, 2016 at 1:44 answer added Zizouz212 timeline score: 2
Jan 9, 2016 at 11:28 answer added ctrl-alt-delor timeline score: 0
Jan 9, 2016 at 11:16 comment added ctrl-alt-delor Commercial is not the opposite of Open Source. E.G. the GNU licence and many others are Free Software, Open Source, and commercial licences. ““Free software” does not mean “noncommercial”. A free program must be available for commercial use”
Nov 10, 2015 at 0:31 comment added user3392 This is an absolutely terrible idea. When you change email addresses, or sell the copyright and then get hit by a bus, it suddenly becomes impossible for people to comply with the license. Your software, which was previously free, is no longer free.
Sep 8, 2015 at 10:10 comment added user2425 Most licenses already do the former, but I have never seen one that does the later?
Sep 5, 2015 at 23:27 comment added user900 As a software developer I'd caution you about coming up with restrictions like this. Your library better be pretty spectacular if you're going to start enforcing uncommon things like this. Take for example openSSL. I have to show Eric Young's name any time I advertise my product. That's uncommon and pushing it for me, but since I'm not a world class cryptographer and can't roll my own, I'm willing to comply. However that still hasn't kept me from investigating using alternative libraries.
Sep 5, 2015 at 23:26 history edited HDE 226868 CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 29 characters in body
Sep 5, 2015 at 23:25 comment added HDE 226868 Have you considered Open Source Stack Exchange?
Sep 5, 2015 at 18:17 review First posts
Sep 5, 2015 at 23:26
Sep 5, 2015 at 18:14 history asked thePiGrepper CC BY-SA 3.0