Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 17, 2020 at 8:31 history edited CommunityBot
Commonmark migration
Mar 19, 2019 at 16:24 comment added David Siegel The question starts "[a linked question} states that BFOQ exceptions (probably) would not be a sufficient argument for allowing Hooters to discriminate..." That is the premise for everything that follows. It may, of course, be incorrect.
Mar 19, 2019 at 16:18 comment added Trish @DavidSiegel actually how he phrased it he said "Assume I claim it is not a BFOQ, apply with all other qualifications and sue for being declined" not "Assume it is not a BFOQ and I apply with all real BFOQ and sue if declined"
Mar 19, 2019 at 15:24 comment added David Siegel The question specifically proceeds on the assumption that the BFOQ argument will not hold up for Hooters hiring. If it will, the whole basis of the question is faulty.
Mar 19, 2019 at 12:37 history edited Trish CC BY-SA 4.0
added 38 characters in body
Mar 19, 2019 at 0:54 history edited Trish CC BY-SA 4.0
added 111 characters in body
Mar 19, 2019 at 0:35 history edited Trish CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1145 characters in body
Mar 19, 2019 at 0:16 history edited Trish CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1145 characters in body
Mar 18, 2019 at 23:58 history answered Trish CC BY-SA 4.0