Skip to main content
18 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 10, 2019 at 22:46 comment added Putvi Phoog, its when congress has given the ability to be punished that an action is normally considered a crime. It's not that any law is a crime when you break it.
Apr 10, 2019 at 20:39 comment added Putvi law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-I Those are what are considered criminal offenses.
Apr 10, 2019 at 20:36 comment added Putvi It wouldn't be in front of him as it's not listed as a criminal offense.
Apr 10, 2019 at 20:35 comment added phoog But that goes right back to the heart of my question: What basis would the judge use to decide whether someone charged with violating 8 USC 1185(b) has been charged with a criminal offense?
Apr 10, 2019 at 20:25 comment added Putvi Phoog, infractions and midemeanors would be criminal offenses as well. Even if you are charged via complaint, for one of those, you go to the judge for a preliminary hearing and he or she decides if you violated a criminal offense. Read the preliminary hearing section here. justice.gov/usao-mn/criminal-procedures
Apr 10, 2019 at 20:21 comment added user6726 The part where you claim "there are further laws that address passports that do establish punishments". You did not show that there source in law for this claim.
Apr 10, 2019 at 20:16 history edited phoog CC BY-SA 4.0
Fixing link
Apr 10, 2019 at 20:16 comment added phoog Thanks for the information about indictments. The justice.gov link notes that misdemeanor charges do not require the involvement of a grand jury, and the Wikipedia article also mentions a lower class of offence called "infraction." Can we be certain that the unlawful acts described in §1185(b) do not constitute a misdemeanor or (perhaps more likely) an infraction? If so, how?
Apr 10, 2019 at 20:10 comment added Putvi Phoog, I added a section dealing how one is charged in criminal law since you asked about it in general and I did not see your comment when I started my original answer.
Apr 10, 2019 at 20:09 history edited Putvi CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1053 characters in body
Apr 10, 2019 at 19:43 comment added Putvi Yes, the penalties only apply to non citizens. There is no penalty for leaving without a passport if you are a citizen. There was was a fine proposed for a citizen trying to re-enter without a passport as given in the link I provided. messersmithlaw.com/ina-212a7a
Apr 10, 2019 at 19:40 comment added phoog "some infractions give you a lifetime ban if you are not a citizen": that is not relevant to the statute under discussion, which applies only to citizens. The WHTI fee mentioned in the passportinfo.com post is still in the proposed rule stage (reginfo.gov/public/do/…), as it has been for three years. (It also appears not to apply to US citizens entering by air.)
Apr 10, 2019 at 19:32 comment added Putvi @user6726 which part do you want a law citation for?
Apr 10, 2019 at 19:30 comment added Putvi Also, some infractions give you a lifetime ban if you are not a citizen.. See dyanwilliamslaw.com/tag/form-i-860
Apr 10, 2019 at 19:30 comment added user6726 Your citation for passport laws is not law, it is policy-related rhetoric. I could not be used in court to establish that a law was violated. We need a citation with USC or CFR in it.
Apr 10, 2019 at 19:27 comment added Putvi The main method of dealing with it would be deportation. A punishment does not have to be imprisonment or fines. That does not apply to actual citizens though. The Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative is not meant to punish actual American citizens, but fines have been suggested. passportinfo.com/blog/new-passport-fines-on-us-border-crossing
Apr 10, 2019 at 19:20 comment added phoog "there are further laws that address passports that do establish punishments": can you cite those laws? I do not see any.
Apr 10, 2019 at 19:16 history answered Putvi CC BY-SA 4.0