The complaint is here for all to see; the defendants are The United States of America, Emily Webster Murphy, Administrator of the General Services Administration, Alexander Acosta, Secretary of Labor, Alex Azar II, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Betsy DeVos, Secretary of Education, Sonny Perdue, Secretary of Agriculture, Robert Wilkie, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and David L. Bernhardt, Acting Secretary of the § Interior, in their official capacities. Starting on page 7 it describes the defendants and why a particular defendant is names. In the case of the US,

The United States of America is a defendant based on the actions of the United States Congress in enacting the NDAA, and because it is a proper defendant under [5 U.S.C. § 702][1], which says that the US may be named as a defendant in a suit over an [agency action][2].

This will be heard in a federal district court. [1]: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/702 [2]: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/551

The complaint is here for all to see; the defendants are The United States of America, Emily Webster Murphy, Administrator of the General Services Administration, Alexander Acosta, Secretary of Labor, Alex Azar II, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Betsy DeVos, Secretary of Education, Sonny Perdue, Secretary of Agriculture, Robert Wilkie, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and David L. Bernhardt, Acting Secretary of the § Interior, in their official capacities. Starting on page 7 it describes the defendants and why a particular defendant is names. In the case of the US,

The United States of America is a defendant based on the actions of the United States Congress in enacting the NDAA, and because it is a proper defendant under 5 U.S.C. § 702, which says that the US may be named as a defendant in a suit over an agency action.

This will be heard in a federal district court.