Skip to main content
Commonmark migration
Source Link

#Short Answer

Short Answer

#Long Answer

Long Answer

#Short Answer

#Long Answer

Short Answer

Long Answer

edited body
Source Link
ohwilleke
  • 239.6k
  • 15
  • 465
  • 825

But, if the business finances the purchase of the property with a mortgage, the business can deduct the interest paid, but not the principal payments. Depreciation of improvements on real estate (for most of recent U.S. tax history, over a straight line 39.5 year depreciation period) can counterbalance some of the principal payments, although often more slowly than the principal payments are actually made. Also, isif depreciation deductions wipe out too much of the business's income, those depreciation deductions are disallowed or deferred.

But, if the business finances the purchase of the property with a mortgage, the business can deduct the interest paid, but not the principal payments. Depreciation of improvements on real estate (for most of recent U.S. tax history, over a straight line 39.5 year depreciation period) can counterbalance some of the principal payments, although often more slowly than the principal payments are actually made. Also, is depreciation deductions wipe out too much of the business's income, those depreciation deductions are disallowed or deferred.

But, if the business finances the purchase of the property with a mortgage, the business can deduct the interest paid, but not the principal payments. Depreciation of improvements on real estate (for most of recent U.S. tax history, over a straight line 39.5 year depreciation period) can counterbalance some of the principal payments, although often more slowly than the principal payments are actually made. Also, if depreciation deductions wipe out too much of the business's income, those depreciation deductions are disallowed or deferred.

added 159 characters in body
Source Link
ohwilleke
  • 239.6k
  • 15
  • 465
  • 825

#Short Answer

Yes. Unless your lease says otherwise. Your sole source of legal protections is your lease. Without knowing the detailed provisions of your lease, it is impossible to know.

#Long Answer

Second Footnote On Rent Control and Cooperative Apartments

Even further afield, in places like New York City that have rent control, residential tenants become more economically equivalent to apartment owners, and residential landlords become more economically equivalent to a combined mortgage lenders and home owner's association. There was a strong demand for rent control in New York City at the time that rent control was adopted, because economic necessity meant that mostly people needed to live in one unit of a multi-unit apartment building, but the legal concept of ownership of one unit within a larger apartment building that is now commonly called a "condominium" in the United States, did not exist. So, there were a lot of renters in New York City who very much wanted to be de facto apartment owners who didn't have the legal tools available at the time to achieve this goal.

The other work around which was used in the Northeast before the condominium was invented was a "cooperative apartment", in which all of the residents of a particular apartment building owned the entire building and were jointly and severally liable on the mortgage on the building, but then were allocated a unit within the building in exchange for economic obligations to the cooperative association that managed the building on a not for profit basis for its owners.

Yes.

#Short Answer

Yes. Unless your lease says otherwise. Your sole source of legal protections is your lease. Without knowing the detailed provisions of your lease, it is impossible to know.

#Long Answer

Second Footnote On Rent Control and Cooperative Apartments

Even further afield, in places like New York City that have rent control, residential tenants become more economically equivalent to apartment owners, and residential landlords become more economically equivalent to a combined mortgage lenders and home owner's association. There was a strong demand for rent control in New York City at the time that rent control was adopted, because economic necessity meant that mostly people needed to live in one unit of a multi-unit apartment building, but the legal concept of ownership of one unit within a larger apartment building that is now commonly called a "condominium" in the United States, did not exist. So, there were a lot of renters in New York City who very much wanted to be de facto apartment owners who didn't have the legal tools available at the time to achieve this goal.

The other work around which was used in the Northeast before the condominium was invented was a "cooperative apartment", in which all of the residents of a particular apartment building owned the entire building and were jointly and severally liable on the mortgage on the building, but then were allocated a unit within the building in exchange for economic obligations to the cooperative association that managed the building on a not for profit basis for its owners.

added 159 characters in body
Source Link
ohwilleke
  • 239.6k
  • 15
  • 465
  • 825
Loading
added 159 characters in body
Source Link
ohwilleke
  • 239.6k
  • 15
  • 465
  • 825
Loading
added 159 characters in body
Source Link
ohwilleke
  • 239.6k
  • 15
  • 465
  • 825
Loading
added 159 characters in body
Source Link
ohwilleke
  • 239.6k
  • 15
  • 465
  • 825
Loading
added 493 characters in body
Source Link
ohwilleke
  • 239.6k
  • 15
  • 465
  • 825
Loading
added 493 characters in body
Source Link
ohwilleke
  • 239.6k
  • 15
  • 465
  • 825
Loading
added 493 characters in body
Source Link
ohwilleke
  • 239.6k
  • 15
  • 465
  • 825
Loading
added 493 characters in body
Source Link
ohwilleke
  • 239.6k
  • 15
  • 465
  • 825
Loading
Source Link
ohwilleke
  • 239.6k
  • 15
  • 465
  • 825
Loading