Timeline for Illegal detainment by private citizens when there's a unlocked but alarmed emergency exit
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2019 at 20:22 | comment | added | mkennedy | Is this a workplace? | |
| May 20, 2019 at 22:39 | answer | added | Gerard Ashton | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 20, 2019 at 22:21 | answer | added | emory | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 20, 2019 at 21:48 | comment | added | user6726 | Do you have a real jurisdiction in mind? Question 1 hinges on details of the supposed statute (and other laws in the jurisdiction). | |
| May 20, 2019 at 21:31 | comment | added | David Siegel | Do "those in charge" say why they are doing this, or how long they intend to keep the doors locked? Are they armed? Could those being held plausibly and safely force them to give up the keys? | |
| May 20, 2019 at 20:22 | answer | added | Putvi | timeline score: -3 | |
| May 20, 2019 at 19:57 | comment | added | brhans | I wonder if I could argue that being detained against my will by a private citizen amounts to kidnapping, which (at least to me) is an emergency - and therefore perfectly justifies my use of an alarmed emergency exit? | |
| May 20, 2019 at 19:40 | history | asked | Matthew Cline | CC BY-SA 4.0 |