Timeline for Can a U.S. election be overturned for foreign interference?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2020 at 8:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| May 28, 2019 at 12:29 | comment | added | David Siegel | The designation " U.S." was in the body of the initial question. I added the tag making this more obvious after the answer by DaleM had already been posted. | |
| May 28, 2019 at 6:42 | comment | added | Mark Johnson | @A.fm A US based answer would be the best answer, but other jurisdiction answers should also be of interest to anyone interested. | |
| May 28, 2019 at 6:32 | comment | added | A.fm. | @MarkJohnson I don't disagree. The answer is cited, sounds plausible, and Dale is from Australia. It probably is accurate. I retracted the flag because the jurisdiction was added post-answer. I don't think an answer from a different jurisdiction than the one an OP asks about is sufficient to stand as the "best" answer to a question that specifies a jurisdiction. For that reason (and because it can't be changed unless the answer is edited again), my downvote remains. That said, I notice the edit that presumably added the jurisdiction was not made by OP, so perhaps the edit changed OP's intent. | |
| May 28, 2019 at 6:32 | comment | added | Mark Johnson | @DaleM Yes, because of (v), (vi) came into effect. Just a practical sample that this not just theory, but is actively done in practice. | |
| May 28, 2019 at 6:23 | comment | added | A.fm. | Hey @DaleM, fair enough, my apologies. Retracted the flag. | |
| May 28, 2019 at 6:16 | comment | added | Mark Johnson | @A.fm A documented sample on how an election can be partially or in whole can be overturned is an valid answer to the question, thus should not be down voted simply because you disagree. | |
| May 28, 2019 at 6:04 | comment | added | Dale M♦ | @MarkJohnson but (vi) was exercised at the same time. | |
| May 28, 2019 at 6:04 | comment | added | Dale M♦ | @A.fm at the time the answer was posted the question did not have united-states | |
| May 28, 2019 at 5:45 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| May 28, 2019 at 6:25 | |||||
| May 28, 2019 at 5:44 | comment | added | A.fm. | This should be flagged as "not an answer" because it does not contain a single word of relevance to OP's question. | |
| May 28, 2019 at 5:33 | comment | added | Mark Johnson | Point (v) was exercised in the last years due to dual citizenship problems (elected officials may not be dual citizens ) | |
| May 28, 2019 at 3:04 | history | edited | Dale M♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 775 characters in body
|
| May 28, 2019 at 2:47 | history | answered | Dale M♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |