Timeline for What would someone be charged with if they did this as the patient before surgery?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2022 at 13:27 | comment | added | gnasher729 | Few days ago I had to sign that I had never had an allergic reaction against X. So what do you think would happen if I lied, and had an allergic reaction again? | |
| Jun 29, 2019 at 12:12 | vote | accept | Snack_Food_Termite | ||
| Jun 29, 2019 at 10:44 | answer | added | Dale M♦ | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 29, 2019 at 9:17 | comment | added | Snack_Food_Termite | I am happy for either because I will get something out of any answer. I genuiely have no idea what the answer is. | |
| Jun 29, 2019 at 9:16 | comment | added | Paul Johnson | Not at all, its just useful to know. "Either" is perfectly acceptable. law.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/308/… | |
| Jun 29, 2019 at 9:04 | comment | added | Snack_Food_Termite | I am happy for either. Yes I know that will get this question closed. So I have to toss a coin and pick one? | |
| Jun 29, 2019 at 9:02 | comment | added | Paul Johnson | Are you asking about the US or Australian law? | |
| Jun 29, 2019 at 5:15 | review | First posts | |||
| Jul 2, 2019 at 15:41 | |||||
| Jun 29, 2019 at 5:11 | history | asked | Snack_Food_Termite | CC BY-SA 4.0 |