Timeline for Refusing service based on sexual orientation
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2019 at 15:55 | comment | added | David Siegel | @hszmv Correct. I had been under the impression that this case was remanded for further proceedings, but it seems I was mistaken on that point. I have edited my answer to say so. What the CO law properly requires in such a case, and whether that law is consistant with teh federal constitution, is undetermined. | |
| Aug 22, 2019 at 15:52 | history | edited | David Siegel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
clarify
|
| Aug 22, 2019 at 15:38 | comment | added | hszmv | Not redone, but overturned. SCOTUS basically said that the Colorado Court's decision was so fundimentally colored by an anti-Christain bias, that even a redo would not solve the issue. It Highlighted that while it ruled against Masterpiece in this matter, it held in favor of bakeriers owned by LGBT owners refusing to make anti-LGBT cakes. Were the law applied evenly, Masterpiece should have been given a favorable ruling. Basically, Colorado case law is on Masterpieces side, but the Court was biased against Masterpiece and ignored the case law. | |
| Aug 22, 2019 at 15:20 | history | answered | David Siegel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |