Timeline for What would happen if Protagoras v Euathlus were heard in court today?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2019 at 9:58 | vote | accept | nick012000 | ||
| Sep 16, 2019 at 1:56 | comment | added | Nacht | I don't understand Euathlus' position at all. The case would be to decide whether Euathlus can leave the contract simply by not pursuing a career in law. If the court decides in his favor, the original contract still stands, and he has won, so he must be paid. If the court decides against him, the original terms of the contract don't matter at all, the court has made its decision. Right? | |
| Sep 15, 2019 at 19:05 | comment | added | Iñaki Viggers | @stackzebra See the OP's comment & reference in that regard, although I posit that it was merely a recourse for purposes of narrative and/or debate, not a realistic/actual limitation of the Greek intellectuals of that time. | |
| Sep 15, 2019 at 18:31 | comment | added | stackzebra | What was the outcome of the original proceedings? | |
| Sep 15, 2019 at 11:19 | comment | added | rlms | The logical conclusion to me is that Euathlus wins the case (since he hasn't won any cases at the time of the lawsuit), but this then gives him a win and so if Protagoras sued a second time he would be successful. | |
| Sep 14, 2019 at 15:11 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Sep 14, 2019 at 12:26 | answer | added | Dale M♦ | timeline score: 5 | |
| Sep 14, 2019 at 11:09 | comment | added | Iñaki Viggers | Whoever VTC, you really should articulate why you believe this question "should" be closed. | |
| Sep 14, 2019 at 11:07 | answer | added | Iñaki Viggers | timeline score: 14 | |
| Sep 14, 2019 at 7:25 | review | Close votes | |||
| Sep 17, 2019 at 2:37 | |||||
| Sep 14, 2019 at 7:17 | history | edited | nick012000 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
elaboration
|
| Sep 14, 2019 at 7:05 | history | asked | nick012000 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |