Timeline for What would happen if Protagoras v Euathlus were heard in court today?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2019 at 11:41 | history | edited | Dale M♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 328 characters in body
|
| Sep 14, 2019 at 13:15 | comment | added | Iñaki Viggers | It is quite a stretch to say that "the contract is [...] discharged by the ruling". (1) The focus of the ruling would be whether or not Euathlus has de facto defaulted on his payment, not whether Euathlus's declining voids the contract. (2) The allusion to Euathlus's 1st win in court shifts to him the burden of overcoming or superseding the presumption --at the formation of the contract-- that his intent was to practice law. (3) The agreement is in terms of "after [winning the 1st case]", which is open-ended and encompasses any future success if Euathlus ever decides to practice law. | |
| Sep 14, 2019 at 12:33 | history | edited | Dale M♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 374 characters in body; added 139 characters in body
|
| Sep 14, 2019 at 12:26 | history | answered | Dale M♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |