Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 13, 2022 at 17:05 comment added abukaj Does it mean that execution of Poles for either possession of a file in a public place or sheltering Jews in German occupied Poland during WW2 would not be seen as war crime by IV GC? Moreover, would it mean that Polish resistance executing Poles following the German-issued law were actual criminals?
Mar 30, 2022 at 23:40 history bounty ended Allure
Jun 17, 2020 at 8:31 history edited CommunityBot
Commonmark migration
Oct 1, 2019 at 2:00 comment added A.fm. @SJuan76 excellent answer. Thanks for citing to sources.
Sep 30, 2019 at 11:52 comment added Mark Johnson @Allure stated simply: Just because Country A has occupied parts of Country B, that part does not become an integral part of the occupier. The basic laws still apply but can be overruled. Sample WW2: Germany occupied a part of France. French laws and sperate customs areas remained. Germany ordered the introduction of CET, replacing WET, for military and economic reasons.
Sep 30, 2019 at 8:09 vote accept Allure
Sep 30, 2019 at 8:02 history edited SJuan76 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 228 characters in body
Sep 30, 2019 at 7:55 history answered SJuan76 CC BY-SA 4.0