Skip to main content
added 279 characters in body
Source Link

Recently, a vegan customer sued Burger King because a plant-based burger he bought at a Burger King franchise was cooked on a grill also used for cooking meat.

This got me thinking: who would usually be liable for this sort of case?

Would it be...

  • the franchisor (Burger King),
  • the franchisee (the actual restaurant owner), or
  • the employee

I'm interested in not only the answer in Florida, where this occurred, but in other places around the world too.


My question is not entirely specific to this example: I'm asking in general. If, for example, an employee cooked a vegan patty on a meat grill even though it shouldn't have been done, as per company rules, would they be liable , or the franchisee, or the franchisor?

Recently, a vegan customer sued Burger King because a plant-based burger he bought at a Burger King franchise was cooked on a grill also used for cooking meat.

This got me thinking: who would usually be liable for this sort of case?

Would it be...

  • the franchisor (Burger King),
  • the franchisee (the actual restaurant owner), or
  • the employee

I'm interested in not only the answer in Florida, where this occurred, but in other places around the world too.

Recently, a vegan customer sued Burger King because a plant-based burger he bought at a Burger King franchise was cooked on a grill also used for cooking meat.

This got me thinking: who would usually be liable for this sort of case?

Would it be...

  • the franchisor (Burger King),
  • the franchisee (the actual restaurant owner), or
  • the employee

I'm interested in not only the answer in Florida, where this occurred, but in other places around the world too.


My question is not entirely specific to this example: I'm asking in general. If, for example, an employee cooked a vegan patty on a meat grill even though it shouldn't have been done, as per company rules, would they be liable , or the franchisee, or the franchisor?

I changed the description of the case to reflect the question the OP is asking; the way he asked it obscured that question
Source Link

Recently, a vegan customer decided to suesued Burger King for cookingbecause a plant-based burger he bought at a Burger King franchise was cooked on a grill also used for cooking meat.

This got me thinking: who would usually be liable for this sort of case?

Would it be...

  • the franchisor (Burger King),
  • the franchisee (the actual restaurant owner), or
  • the employee

I'm interested in not only the answer in Florida, where this occurred, but in other places around the world too.

Recently, a vegan customer decided to sue Burger King for cooking a plant-based burger on a grill also used for cooking meat.

This got me thinking: who would usually be liable for this sort of case?

Would it be...

  • the franchisor (Burger King),
  • the franchisee (the actual restaurant owner), or
  • the employee

I'm interested in not only the answer in Florida, where this occurred, but in other places around the world too.

Recently, a vegan customer sued Burger King because a plant-based burger he bought at a Burger King franchise was cooked on a grill also used for cooking meat.

This got me thinking: who would usually be liable for this sort of case?

Would it be...

  • the franchisor (Burger King),
  • the franchisee (the actual restaurant owner), or
  • the employee

I'm interested in not only the answer in Florida, where this occurred, but in other places around the world too.

Source Link
Loading