Skip to main content
6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 8, 2016 at 5:45 comment added ohwilleke If the Florida Supreme Court ruled on the basis of the state constitutional prohibition on unreasonable search and seizure, it could avoid U.S. Supreme Court review and that kind of strategy isn't uncommon. When it rules based upon the federal law instead, it is taking a view that state law only provides the minimum permitted protection of federal rights.
Nov 4, 2015 at 5:22 vote accept CommunityBot
Nov 3, 2015 at 16:42 answer added Alexanne Senger timeline score: 7
Nov 3, 2015 at 14:00 answer added user248 timeline score: 0
Nov 3, 2015 at 13:22 comment added user662852 Cut n paste from wikipedia: In Martin v. Hunter's Lessee, 14 U.S. 304 (1816), and Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. 264 (1821), the Supreme Court held that the Supremacy Clause and the judicial power granted in Article III give the Supreme Court the ultimate power to review state court decisions involving issues arising under the Constitution and laws of the United States.
Nov 3, 2015 at 12:52 history asked user3309 CC BY-SA 3.0