Timeline for Do I have to adhere to my own software licences for them to remain enforceable?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2020 at 20:04 | vote | accept | Toby Smith | ||
| Jun 19, 2020 at 0:57 | answer | added | xirt | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 18, 2020 at 21:39 | answer | added | Dale M♦ | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 18, 2020 at 18:54 | comment | added | Matt | @BlueDogRanch "Better elsewhere" is not a valid close reason. "Off topic" is, but this is clearly a question about law. | |
| Jun 18, 2020 at 18:31 | comment | added | Ron Beyer | You can dual-license your software, releasing as GPL and keeping another license closed-source with whatever terms you want. | |
| Jun 18, 2020 at 18:18 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jul 19, 2020 at 3:02 | |||||
| Jun 18, 2020 at 18:16 | comment | added | Toby Smith | @BlueDogRanch I was debating between the two. What makes you think it would be better there? In the end I chose here because my question isn't about the GPL specifically, but is about how the laws around it work. | |
| Jun 18, 2020 at 17:58 | comment | added | BlueDogRanch | I’m voting to close this question because it's better asked at opensource.stackexchange.com | |
| Jun 18, 2020 at 17:38 | history | asked | Toby Smith | CC BY-SA 4.0 |