Timeline for Landlord Ignoring My Potential Replacements (UK)
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2020 at 11:48 | comment | added | Paul Johnson | Why is this being down-voted? It looks like a perfectly good answer. | |
| Jun 20, 2020 at 12:18 | comment | added | Iñaki Viggers | @PaulJohnson Generally speaking, yes, as I pointed out at the end of the 2nd paragraph. But the landlord's pattern of conduct would fail the test of not being "wholly unreasonable". See Reichman and Dunn v. Beverige and Gauntlett, 2006 EWCA Civ 1659 at para. 40. The pattern described by the OP warrants an intervention of equity, Id. at para. 35, thereby superseding English precedent as to landlords having no duty to mitigate losses. Thus, your conclusion & answer are accurate in ordinary scenarios but not in the OP's matter. | |
| Jun 20, 2020 at 9:01 | comment | added | Paul Johnson | It depends on the wording of the lease. If there is any language about changes being in writing then the landlord's verbal promises are even emptier than usual. | |
| Jun 19, 2020 at 18:30 | history | answered | Iñaki Viggers | CC BY-SA 4.0 |