Timeline for Employer listed incorrect end date in contract
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15 at 19:26 | vote | accept | Queens Coder | ||
| Jul 10, 2020 at 3:30 | answer | added | Dale M♦ | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 9, 2020 at 20:46 | comment | added | Just a guy | Also, from your comment below, it sounds as if it would have been impossible for you to work 200 hours during the term of the contract. Is that right? Or did your schedule play any role in the shortfall? | |
| Jul 9, 2020 at 20:44 | comment | added | Just a guy | When you say you were "required" to work 200 hours, what exactly does the contract say? And what does it say will happen if you work less than 200 hours? | |
| Jul 9, 2020 at 20:34 | comment | added | Iñaki Viggers | What you added in this comment is quite relevant, but other crucial information is missing. Is the 200-hour requirement in the contract? The type of work product or job would determine whether or not the 200-hour requirement is material. You did not include the literal terms of the contract, and these might trigger the doctrine of contra proferentem. What does the contract say regarding changes thereto? can you prove the employer promised to accommodate your concern? | |
| Jul 9, 2020 at 18:57 | answer | added | user6726 | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jul 9, 2020 at 18:40 | review | First posts | |||
| Jul 23, 2020 at 18:43 | |||||
| Jul 9, 2020 at 18:38 | history | asked | Queens Coder | CC BY-SA 4.0 |