Timeline for Are there any defenses for defendant who had a police officer order the filling of their known fraudulent prescription? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
22 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Dec 4, 2015 at 2:38 | history | notice added | jimsug | Content dispute | |
| S Dec 4, 2015 at 2:38 | history | locked | jimsug | ||
| Dec 4, 2015 at 2:38 | comment | added | jimsug | Your point 5 is answered here, here and here. You're going to need to go to Law Meta now, because you clearly want community input, and they've given it multiple times on your previous questions. Perhaps there you'll get some support for reopening the question. | |
| Dec 4, 2015 at 2:34 | comment | added | Breakskater | @jimsug, can you justify point #5 in the question? | |
| Dec 4, 2015 at 2:32 | comment | added | Breakskater | @JasonAller, can we clear the comments and resume the question clean for the community to answer? | |
| Dec 4, 2015 at 2:30 | comment | added | jimsug | And you absolutely did say that there has to be some defense for the suspect in your comment, here. | |
| Dec 4, 2015 at 2:29 | comment | added | jimsug | I don't believe this question should be reopened, but you should be able to vote to reopen it. This question has been asked and answered already - it could just as validly have been closed as a duplicate of this one, this one, this one, this one, or this one. If you are unhappy with the fact that this question is on-hold, please feel free to raise it on Law Meta. | |
| Dec 4, 2015 at 2:28 | comment | added | Breakskater | @jimsug, to the second topic in your comments, I did not say there has to be some defense for the suspect. The question title clearly says are there any defenses. I'm looking for other potential defenses to explore to see where they lead. | |
| Dec 4, 2015 at 2:20 | comment | added | Breakskater | @jimsug, okay, that is your opinion and you're entitled to it. You say there is no defense. What about the rest of the community? Let's open the question to get their thoughts and legal analysis | |
| Dec 4, 2015 at 2:07 | comment | added | jimsug | I'm not saying that there is no situation where you will have no defense. I am saying that in this situation, unless you introduce new facts, the answer will be the same. But you are absolutely and completely wrong to say that there has to be some defense for the suspect. No one, anywhere, is automatically granted some general defense - it is up to them to prove it. | |
| Dec 4, 2015 at 2:03 | comment | added | Breakskater | @jimsug, it is wise to explore all the different angles to see where each one leads; a couple have led to dead ends and one has shown some promise. This question was generalized intentionally so people would think outside of the box instead of constraining their thoughts to the question | |
| Dec 3, 2015 at 2:56 | comment | added | Dale M♦ | "Screwed" in this context means: if the facts above are supported by evidence and there are no other relevant factors, the charge will almost certainly be proved. | |
| Dec 3, 2015 at 0:12 | comment | added | jimsug | @Breakskater There does not have to be any defense for the suspect. Unfortunately, sometimes in life, if you commit a crime, you have to face the consequences. No number of rephrasings of the same question will change that fact. | |
| Dec 2, 2015 at 22:27 | history | closed | Jason Aller | Not suitable for this site | |
| Dec 2, 2015 at 22:23 | history | edited | Breakskater | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 6 characters in body; edited title
|
| Dec 2, 2015 at 22:21 | comment | added | Breakskater | @DaleM, What exactly do you mean by "the suspect is screwed"? The suspected was wronged and can't do anything about it? There has to be some defense for the suspect right? | |
| Dec 2, 2015 at 21:34 | history | reopened |
Breakskater jimsug |
||
| Dec 2, 2015 at 15:40 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Dec 2, 2015 at 21:34 | |||||
| Dec 2, 2015 at 15:21 | history | edited | Breakskater | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 13 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
| Dec 2, 2015 at 12:09 | history | closed | jimsug | Needs details or clarity | |
| Dec 2, 2015 at 9:40 | comment | added | Dale M♦ | I can see several defenses for the police officer and the pharmacist. The suspect is screwed. | |
| Dec 2, 2015 at 6:02 | history | asked | Breakskater | CC BY-SA 3.0 |