Skip to main content
I would never say the ill- prefix for that word, would signal too many algorithms to pull their weapons, so I would prefer to talk like I would normally, and make sure I say "legal" so the AI "grammar" algo does not freak at me. For example, I always said/wrote "mental health" not the other version.
Source Link

Was it illegallegal in 2004 to sell a minor an airline ticket from the US to a foreign country without proof of parental consent?

Alone, when I was 17 (born 1987), I bought a ~$537 round-trip web/internet ticket (for a 2-week trip to Amsterdam by way of Germany) and returned at age 18. I did not have official parental consent, and I was not asked for proof of consent.

Did the airport/airline who made money and/or the travel agent who made money break the law?

As with all my law/legal questions, I do not intend to litigate and do not need legal advice, so I am seeking general legal knowledge, what happens in such situations, what laws apply, how well does the law work covering these factors?

  • In terms of "minors should be protected from unscrupulous merchants taking unfair advantage of their naivete" and "minors should be restricted from jetting off to parts unknown, for their own safety", I did not mean to distinguish one or the other though, judgement could be for both issues, if a line was crossed, either is applicable.

Was it illegal in 2004 to sell a minor an airline ticket from the US to a foreign country without proof of parental consent?

Alone, when I was 17 (born 1987), I bought a round-trip web/internet ticket (for a 2-week trip to Amsterdam by way of Germany) and returned at age 18. I did not have official parental consent, and I was not asked for proof of consent.

Did the airport/airline who made money and/or the travel agent who made money break the law?

As with all my law/legal questions, I do not intend to litigate and do not need legal advice, so I am seeking general legal knowledge, what happens in such situations, what laws apply, how well does the law work covering these factors?

  • In terms of "minors should be protected from unscrupulous merchants taking unfair advantage of their naivete" and "minors should be restricted from jetting off to parts unknown, for their own safety", I did not mean to distinguish one or the other though, judgement could be for both issues, if a line was crossed, either is applicable.

Was it legal in 2004 to sell a minor an airline ticket from the US to a foreign country without proof of parental consent?

Alone, when I was 17 (born 1987), I bought a ~$537 round-trip web/internet ticket (for a 2-week trip to Amsterdam by way of Germany) and returned at age 18. I did not have official parental consent, and I was not asked for proof of consent.

Did the airport/airline who made money and/or the travel agent who made money break the law?

As with all my law/legal questions, I do not intend to litigate and do not need legal advice, so I am seeking general legal knowledge, what happens in such situations, what laws apply, how well does the law work covering these factors?

  • In terms of "minors should be protected from unscrupulous merchants taking unfair advantage of their naivete" and "minors should be restricted from jetting off to parts unknown, for their own safety", I did not mean to distinguish one or the other though, judgement could be for both issues, if a line was crossed, either is applicable.
Trim irrelevant information, focus on a single answerable question (question had several "needs more focus" close votes)
Source Link
Ryan M
  • 10.3k
  • 2
  • 47
  • 63

us-int airport travel underage passenger laws, I was never asked for consent, did agent legally Was it illegal in 2004 to sell me ticket, did thea minor an airline/airport break ticket from the lawUS to a foreign country without proof of parental consent?

Alone, when I was 17 (born 1987) shown an advert for, I bought a ~$307 round-trip web/internet ticket (for a 2 week-week trip to AmsterdamnAmsterdam by way of Germany it blinked) and returned at age 18,. I did not have official parental consent, and I was not asked for proof of consent.

A long time ago, far far away (now I'm reflecting on how my life experiences formed and why I write about issues the way I do) with enough time to ask ifDid the airport/airline who made money broke the law and/or the travel agent who made money brokebreak the law? Was I liable at 17 or 18 the same given international/domestic laws, what about other organizations, jurisidictions, agents?

All alone, I sat in the hotel/hostel for 2 weeks and used the free wifi internet, other than museums and exactly 5 beers over 2 weeks (I could only afford the ticket, hotel room, food, and did not smoke yet), and walking around the hotel in a circle when they needed to clean my hotel/hostel room, I did not go anywhere else, so I do not think that crosses any other jurisdictions, but did I cross any relevant lines/jurisdictions?

https://www.google.com/search?q=us+international+travel+underage+passenger+laws&oq=us+international+travel+underage+passenger+laws is going to take me alot of time to figure what to ask with keywords, might as well try to ask in English instead.

As with all my law/legal questions, even though my both parents had legal backgrounds, I do not intend to litigate and do not need legal advice, so I am seeking general legal knowledge, what happens in such situations, what laws apply, how well does the law work covering these factors?

Addendums (responses to replies):

  • I was not sure how it was possible, and had thought I might encounter legal issues but did not somehow. The travel agent (year 2004 internet so I do not know if real company or just an advert really, it had <\marqee> html tags and crazy </tables>, really) asked my age and said being 17 was not a problem but I did not know how that was legal, but my return trip 2 weeks later at 18 I was legal I know. Maybe my going to Amsterdam for a school trip for the first time at 16 was before going again when I was 17 and 18 and at that time having the accompanied service made me worry back then.

  • I actually had a flight attendant at the time baby me a bit, I am not sure if that was intentional or just my perception, asking how I was doing and if I needed help. Other than that, there seemed to be some surprise adult attention when I was the only person waiting in the airport's McDonalds waiting area, and going through checks just, maybe they were uncomfortable I was not acting comfortable. Oh and the agent asked me my age and said it was not a problem but I am not sure it was an actual agent.

  • I just remembered the hotel/hostel clerk for the first one of two locations had a form asking if I was over 18, I was 17 when I first arrived. Though, I had somebody I met at the trainstation register me so they would get commission, and I think that might have helped me pass, they whispered to me it was okay and I got the single room for ~$37, I almost fainted when they asked my age (I was almost about to have my 18th birthday in Amsterdam and was 99% there, and that was the first form glitch???) but so they definitely helped. I do not know if that was their policy or a law maybe, just curious.

  • In terms of "minors should be protected from unscrupulous merchants taking unfair advantage of their naivete" and "minors should be restricted from jetting off to parts unknown, for their own safety", I did not mean to distinguish one or the other though, judgement could be for both issues, if a line was crossed, either is applicable.

    In terms of "minors should be protected from unscrupulous merchants taking unfair advantage of their naivete" and "minors should be restricted from jetting off to parts unknown, for their own safety", I did not mean to distinguish one or the other though, judgement could be for both issues, if a line was crossed, either is applicable.

us-int airport travel underage passenger laws, I was never asked for consent, did agent legally sell me ticket, did the airline/airport break the law?

Alone, I was 17 (born 1987) shown an advert for a ~$307 round-trip web/internet ticket (for a 2 week trip to Amsterdamn by way of Germany it blinked) and returned at age 18, I did not have official parental consent, and I was not asked for consent.

A long time ago, far far away (now I'm reflecting on how my life experiences formed and why I write about issues the way I do) with enough time to ask if the airport/airline who made money broke the law and/or the travel agent who made money broke the law? Was I liable at 17 or 18 the same given international/domestic laws, what about other organizations, jurisidictions, agents?

All alone, I sat in the hotel/hostel for 2 weeks and used the free wifi internet, other than museums and exactly 5 beers over 2 weeks (I could only afford the ticket, hotel room, food, and did not smoke yet), and walking around the hotel in a circle when they needed to clean my hotel/hostel room, I did not go anywhere else, so I do not think that crosses any other jurisdictions, but did I cross any relevant lines/jurisdictions?

https://www.google.com/search?q=us+international+travel+underage+passenger+laws&oq=us+international+travel+underage+passenger+laws is going to take me alot of time to figure what to ask with keywords, might as well try to ask in English instead.

As with all my law/legal questions, even though my both parents had legal backgrounds, I do not intend to litigate and do not need legal advice, so I am seeking general legal knowledge, what happens in such situations, what laws apply, how well does the law work covering these factors?

Addendums (responses to replies):

  • I was not sure how it was possible, and had thought I might encounter legal issues but did not somehow. The travel agent (year 2004 internet so I do not know if real company or just an advert really, it had <\marqee> html tags and crazy </tables>, really) asked my age and said being 17 was not a problem but I did not know how that was legal, but my return trip 2 weeks later at 18 I was legal I know. Maybe my going to Amsterdam for a school trip for the first time at 16 was before going again when I was 17 and 18 and at that time having the accompanied service made me worry back then.

  • I actually had a flight attendant at the time baby me a bit, I am not sure if that was intentional or just my perception, asking how I was doing and if I needed help. Other than that, there seemed to be some surprise adult attention when I was the only person waiting in the airport's McDonalds waiting area, and going through checks just, maybe they were uncomfortable I was not acting comfortable. Oh and the agent asked me my age and said it was not a problem but I am not sure it was an actual agent.

  • I just remembered the hotel/hostel clerk for the first one of two locations had a form asking if I was over 18, I was 17 when I first arrived. Though, I had somebody I met at the trainstation register me so they would get commission, and I think that might have helped me pass, they whispered to me it was okay and I got the single room for ~$37, I almost fainted when they asked my age (I was almost about to have my 18th birthday in Amsterdam and was 99% there, and that was the first form glitch???) but so they definitely helped. I do not know if that was their policy or a law maybe, just curious.

  • In terms of "minors should be protected from unscrupulous merchants taking unfair advantage of their naivete" and "minors should be restricted from jetting off to parts unknown, for their own safety", I did not mean to distinguish one or the other though, judgement could be for both issues, if a line was crossed, either is applicable.

Was it illegal in 2004 to sell a minor an airline ticket from the US to a foreign country without proof of parental consent?

Alone, when I was 17 (born 1987), I bought a round-trip web/internet ticket (for a 2-week trip to Amsterdam by way of Germany) and returned at age 18. I did not have official parental consent, and I was not asked for proof of consent.

Did the airport/airline who made money and/or the travel agent who made money break the law?

As with all my law/legal questions, I do not intend to litigate and do not need legal advice, so I am seeking general legal knowledge, what happens in such situations, what laws apply, how well does the law work covering these factors?

  • In terms of "minors should be protected from unscrupulous merchants taking unfair advantage of their naivete" and "minors should be restricted from jetting off to parts unknown, for their own safety", I did not mean to distinguish one or the other though, judgement could be for both issues, if a line was crossed, either is applicable.
Edit replying in direct linear response to quoted comment.
Source Link

*I was not sure how it was possible, and had thought I might encounter legal issues but did not somehow. The travel agent (year 2004 internet so I do not know if real company or just an advert really, it had <\marqee> html tags and crazy </tables>, really) asked my age and said being 17 was not a problem but I did not know how that was legal, but my return trip 2 weeks later at 18 I was legal I know. Maybe my going to Amsterdam for a school trip for the first time at 16 was before going again when I was 17 and 18 and at that time having the accompanied service made me worry back then.

*I actually had a flight attendant at the time baby me a bit, I am not sure if that was intentional or just my perception, asking how I was doing and if I needed help. Other than that, there seemed to be some surprise adult attention when I was the only person waiting in the airport's McDonalds waiting area, and going through checks just, maybe they were uncomfortable I was not acting comfortable. Oh and the agent asked me my age and said it was not a problem but I am not sure it was an actual agent.

*I just remembered the hotel/hostel clerk for the first one of two locations had a form asking if I was over 18, I was 17 when I first arrived. Though, I had somebody I met at the trainstation register me so they would get commission, and I think that might have helped me pass, they whispered to me it was okay and I got the single room for ~$37, I almost fainted when they asked my age (I was almost about to have my 18th birthday in Amsterdam and was 99% there, and that was the first form glitch???) but so they definitely helped. I do not know if that was their policy or a law maybe, just curious.

  • I was not sure how it was possible, and had thought I might encounter legal issues but did not somehow. The travel agent (year 2004 internet so I do not know if real company or just an advert really, it had <\marqee> html tags and crazy </tables>, really) asked my age and said being 17 was not a problem but I did not know how that was legal, but my return trip 2 weeks later at 18 I was legal I know. Maybe my going to Amsterdam for a school trip for the first time at 16 was before going again when I was 17 and 18 and at that time having the accompanied service made me worry back then.

  • I actually had a flight attendant at the time baby me a bit, I am not sure if that was intentional or just my perception, asking how I was doing and if I needed help. Other than that, there seemed to be some surprise adult attention when I was the only person waiting in the airport's McDonalds waiting area, and going through checks just, maybe they were uncomfortable I was not acting comfortable. Oh and the agent asked me my age and said it was not a problem but I am not sure it was an actual agent.

  • I just remembered the hotel/hostel clerk for the first one of two locations had a form asking if I was over 18, I was 17 when I first arrived. Though, I had somebody I met at the trainstation register me so they would get commission, and I think that might have helped me pass, they whispered to me it was okay and I got the single room for ~$37, I almost fainted when they asked my age (I was almost about to have my 18th birthday in Amsterdam and was 99% there, and that was the first form glitch???) but so they definitely helped. I do not know if that was their policy or a law maybe, just curious.

  • In terms of "minors should be protected from unscrupulous merchants taking unfair advantage of their naivete" and "minors should be restricted from jetting off to parts unknown, for their own safety", I did not mean to distinguish one or the other though, judgement could be for both issues, if a line was crossed, either is applicable.

*I was not sure how it was possible, and had thought I might encounter legal issues but did not somehow. The travel agent (year 2004 internet so I do not know if real company or just an advert really, it had <\marqee> html tags and crazy </tables>, really) asked my age and said being 17 was not a problem but I did not know how that was legal, but my return trip 2 weeks later at 18 I was legal I know. Maybe my going to Amsterdam for a school trip for the first time at 16 was before going again when I was 17 and 18 and at that time having the accompanied service made me worry back then.

*I actually had a flight attendant at the time baby me a bit, I am not sure if that was intentional or just my perception, asking how I was doing and if I needed help. Other than that, there seemed to be some surprise adult attention when I was the only person waiting in the airport's McDonalds waiting area, and going through checks just, maybe they were uncomfortable I was not acting comfortable. Oh and the agent asked me my age and said it was not a problem but I am not sure it was an actual agent.

*I just remembered the hotel/hostel clerk for the first one of two locations had a form asking if I was over 18, I was 17 when I first arrived. Though, I had somebody I met at the trainstation register me so they would get commission, and I think that might have helped me pass, they whispered to me it was okay and I got the single room for ~$37, I almost fainted when they asked my age (I was almost about to have my 18th birthday in Amsterdam and was 99% there, and that was the first form glitch???) but so they definitely helped. I do not know if that was their policy or a law maybe, just curious.

  • I was not sure how it was possible, and had thought I might encounter legal issues but did not somehow. The travel agent (year 2004 internet so I do not know if real company or just an advert really, it had <\marqee> html tags and crazy </tables>, really) asked my age and said being 17 was not a problem but I did not know how that was legal, but my return trip 2 weeks later at 18 I was legal I know. Maybe my going to Amsterdam for a school trip for the first time at 16 was before going again when I was 17 and 18 and at that time having the accompanied service made me worry back then.

  • I actually had a flight attendant at the time baby me a bit, I am not sure if that was intentional or just my perception, asking how I was doing and if I needed help. Other than that, there seemed to be some surprise adult attention when I was the only person waiting in the airport's McDonalds waiting area, and going through checks just, maybe they were uncomfortable I was not acting comfortable. Oh and the agent asked me my age and said it was not a problem but I am not sure it was an actual agent.

  • I just remembered the hotel/hostel clerk for the first one of two locations had a form asking if I was over 18, I was 17 when I first arrived. Though, I had somebody I met at the trainstation register me so they would get commission, and I think that might have helped me pass, they whispered to me it was okay and I got the single room for ~$37, I almost fainted when they asked my age (I was almost about to have my 18th birthday in Amsterdam and was 99% there, and that was the first form glitch???) but so they definitely helped. I do not know if that was their policy or a law maybe, just curious.

  • In terms of "minors should be protected from unscrupulous merchants taking unfair advantage of their naivete" and "minors should be restricted from jetting off to parts unknown, for their own safety", I did not mean to distinguish one or the other though, judgement could be for both issues, if a line was crossed, either is applicable.

Answers respond to questions posed in first 5 basic paragraphs. The rest of the lengthy writing further responded to answers which asked further questions, the content is not in the comments so needs to be in the post.
Source Link
Loading
Rollback to Revision 4
Source Link
Loading
Removed OP yammering on and on about their life. This is a Q&A site, not a blog.
Source Link
Loading
Damn, I missed the 5 minute edit grace period by one word.
Source Link
Loading
Adding addendums, partially in response to answer/comments so far. Wow, what a throwback, memory.
Source Link
Loading
Adding addendums, partially in response to answer/comments so far. Wow, what a throwback, memory.
Source Link
Loading
Source Link
Loading