Timeline for Gorilla glue, when does a court decide to permit a trial
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2021 at 19:00 | comment | added | ohwilleke | @Criggie The modern product liability tort that runs direct to the manufacturer has its roots in much older vendor-purchaser warranty law. The California Supreme Court at some point decided to cut out the middle man. So the two forms of liability heavily overlap. | |
| Feb 14, 2021 at 2:30 | comment | added | Acccumulation | @Criggie Simply because something accomplished one of its desired properties doesn't mean it didn't fail in another. A car is intended to get you to your destination safely. If your brakes go out, you may reach your destination, but not safely. A better defense is that there was no warranty of the glue's safety when used on a human being. | |
| Feb 13, 2021 at 3:01 | comment | added | Criggie | Could it still be "breach of warranty" if the product worked really well ? | |
| Feb 12, 2021 at 19:33 | history | edited | ohwilleke | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1236 characters in body
|
| Feb 12, 2021 at 19:24 | history | edited | ohwilleke | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1236 characters in body
|
| Feb 12, 2021 at 19:06 | history | edited | ohwilleke | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1236 characters in body
|
| Feb 12, 2021 at 19:00 | history | answered | ohwilleke | CC BY-SA 4.0 |