Timeline for Is an SDPX header legally equivalent to a license header?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2021 at 11:40 | comment | added | MSalters | @HvanBuuren: The problem here is that there are multiple viewpoints. You ask "legally equivalent", but the legal perspective can differ from the SPDX people's perspective and the Apache Software Foundation's perspective. David's answer focuses on the latter perspectives. | |
| Mar 2, 2021 at 10:50 | comment | added | H van Buuren | So the latter is my main worry. I've seen several examples of people using a short-hand header, essentially because it's shorter. I take from what you say, that in case of for example Apache 2.0, this is basically not enough. | |
| Mar 1, 2021 at 19:35 | history | edited | David Siegel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fix typos
|
| Mar 1, 2021 at 19:27 | history | answered | David Siegel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |