Timeline for What does it mean when a court case is "dismissed"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2021 at 16:20 | vote | accept | Brh | ||
| May 15, 2021 at 22:34 | comment | added | Matt | @ToddWilcox Note that some of those cases were trying to get to discovery where they would have had a chance to uncover evidence otherwise unavailable in advance. You dont need all the evidence up front. | |
| May 15, 2021 at 3:16 | comment | added | Todd Wilcox | The Wikipedia page linked in the question says most of the cases were dismissed for “lack of evidence”, which suggests the judges asked to see the evidence and were shown little to none in response. I recall reading at least one partial transcript where the plaintiff’s attorney essentially said straight out that they had no evidence to present. | |
| May 14, 2021 at 23:37 | history | became hot network question | |||
| May 14, 2021 at 17:10 | comment | added | Paul Johnson | AIUI many of those cases didn't even try to bring evidence of large-scale fraud. E.g. news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/… Giuliani's claim was not that fraud happened, but that a few Republican voters had their votes wrongly disallowed. “If we had alleged fraud, then yes, but this is not a fraud case,” Giuliani said quickly. | |
| May 14, 2021 at 16:31 | answer | added | Nike Dattani | timeline score: 7 | |
| May 14, 2021 at 16:12 | answer | added | sharur | timeline score: 10 | |
| May 14, 2021 at 15:54 | history | edited | user35069 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 27 characters in body
|
| May 14, 2021 at 15:35 | history | asked | Brh | CC BY-SA 4.0 |