Timeline for Water line is NOT in legal easement
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2021 at 16:19 | comment | added | David Siegel | @Kimberly Curls The utility company may refuse to service the line without anseasement covering the area where the line is placed. That is their choice, unless local law imposes a requirement on them. The line could perhaps be moved. That would have significant costs, which you might have to pay. Or an additional easement could be granted. Note that most easements impose few restrictions on the use of the land by the property owner, mostly that access be granted. But the exact terms vary. You might wish to consult a lawyer on the details of what effects a new easement would actually have. | |
| Jun 8, 2021 at 16:14 | comment | added | Kimberly Curls | The problem is my property offers 40 ft easement already for all utilities. The waterline is OUTSIDE the easement. They wrote an easement, but the waterline was already somewhere else. I am not willing to give another easement as this would increase the easement size to 65 - 70 ft wide. | |
| Jun 7, 2021 at 16:31 | history | edited | David Siegel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fix typos
|
| Jun 7, 2021 at 16:28 | history | edited | user35069 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Jun 7, 2021 at 16:26 | history | answered | David Siegel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |