Skip to main content
16 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 7, 2021 at 18:15 comment added kisspuska I mistakenly referenced paragraph (11) shortened so as to not include: "an insured, claimant, or the physician of either" because I already considered Bob as a "claimant" in light of him not being an "insured" or "the physician of" himself or the insured.
Jul 7, 2021 at 17:52 comment added kisspuska Although the first case I cited is moot, it seems directly relating to the insured (it will be deleted now)
Jul 7, 2021 at 17:50 comment added kisspuska (4) Failing to affirm or deny coverage of claims within a reasonable time after proof of loss requirements have been completed and submitted by the insured. Here, paragraph (4) applies only if the insured submitted proof. (5) Not attempting in good faith to effectuate prompt, fair, and equitable settlements of claims in which liability has become reasonably clear. In (5) it is clear that it is not restricted to be applicable only if the claim is made by the insured.
Jul 7, 2021 at 17:47 comment added kisspuska (11) Delaying the investigation or payment of claims by requiring an insured, claimant[...]
Jul 7, 2021 at 17:47 comment added kisspuska § 790.03 (h) (10) shows it perfectly: "(10) Making known to insureds or claimants a practice of the insurer of appealing from arbitration awards in favor of insureds or claimants for the purpose of compelling them to accept settlements or compromises less than the amount awarded in arbitration."
Jul 7, 2021 at 17:46 comment added kisspuska I beg your pardon, but the code has separate definitions for "claimant" and "insured". All "insured" making a claim are claimants, and specifically an insured claimant, but a claimant may be a 3rd party, too. Please take a look:
Jul 7, 2021 at 17:18 history edited ohwilleke CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1035 characters in body
Jul 7, 2021 at 16:45 history edited ohwilleke CC BY-SA 4.0
added 2990 characters in body
Jul 7, 2021 at 16:39 history edited ohwilleke CC BY-SA 4.0
added 2990 characters in body
Jul 7, 2021 at 16:25 comment added ohwilleke Bob isn't a "claimant". The "claimant" is the first party insured. Cal. In. Code § 790-790.3 applies if Cobb gets blown off by the insurance company, not if Bob does.
Jul 7, 2021 at 5:04 comment added kisspuska This case has many relevant precedents to this question, I'll update my question: Coleman v. Gulf Ins. Group, 41 Cal.3d 782 (Cal. 1986)
Jul 7, 2021 at 4:49 comment added kisspuska (13) Failing to provide promptly a reasonable explanation of the basis relied on in the insurance policy, in relation to the facts or applicable law, for the denial of a claim or for the offer of a compromise settlement. It appears to me that some of the provisions apply towards anyone making a claim, some only to insureds some towards both an insured and a claimant. Am I missing something?
Jul 7, 2021 at 4:48 comment added kisspuska This is what I remembered, and kept bugging my mind: Cal. Ins. Code §790-790.3 (11) Delaying the investigation or payment of claims by requiring a[...] claimant [...] to submit a preliminary claim report, and then requiring the subsequent submission of formal proof of loss forms, both of which submissions contain substantially the same information. (12) Failing to settle claims promptly, where liability has become apparent, under one portion of the insurance policy coverage in order to influence settlements under other portions of the insurance policy coverage.
Jul 6, 2021 at 23:12 comment added kisspuska Thank you for clarifying the legal duties! It makes sense
Jul 6, 2021 at 22:53 vote accept kisspuska
Jul 7, 2021 at 5:22
Jul 6, 2021 at 22:36 history answered ohwilleke CC BY-SA 4.0