Timeline for Why does the prosecutor get both the first and the last word at trial?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2023 at 4:50 | comment | added | S.O.S | Thanks. If the other party does not file a surreply are they essentially giving up their rights to rebuff the new arguments raised by the initial Motion filler? | |
| Jan 13, 2023 at 3:34 | comment | added | ohwilleke | @S.O.S Usually, in motion practice, if someone raises something major and new beyond the scope in a reply, the other party would move the court for leave to file a surreply illustrating how the reply went beyond the scope. | |
| Jan 12, 2023 at 22:34 | comment | added | S.O.S | unless the other party is given an opportunity to present a sur-reply What does given the opportunity mean? Does it mean that the reply is submitted with enough time before the actual hearing so that the opposing party has time to file a rebuttal or do you mean the opportunity during the oral hearing? Thanks for your response. | |
| Oct 21, 2021 at 1:59 | history | answered | ohwilleke | CC BY-SA 4.0 |