Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 29, 2022 at 6:36 comment added The_Sympathizer @Tiger Guy: I suspect further argumentation with you will not be fruitful, and you are entitled to suspect likewise. Thanks.
Jul 29, 2022 at 5:27 comment added Tiger Guy @The_Sympathizer, I disagree. Someone trying to game the law deserves what they get. It isn't written law, but it's the law of the streets: don't start nothing, won't be nothing.
Jul 28, 2022 at 21:45 comment added The_Sympathizer @Tiger Guy: I'd be inclined agree with your factual conclusions, but wishing for a technically improper application of the law to suit your appetite for vengeance/talion, instead of wishing for new law (i.e. saying "it's not per se illegal but imo it should be" instead of "let's hope so"), is to undermine the circumscription of power that the rule-of-law ideal constitutes and so is baby steps on the long road to dictatorship. Much better to have their "petard" break while "hoisting" than to have a dictatorship I think.
Jul 28, 2022 at 21:27 vote accept The_Sympathizer
Jul 28, 2022 at 20:40 comment added phoog "What would happen if you staged or hoaxed the commission of a crime?" It surely depends on the crime.
Jul 28, 2022 at 17:13 answer added Davislor timeline score: 3
Jul 28, 2022 at 14:21 comment added Tiger Guy "injustices of unequal bargaining power," no this is known as being hoisted by your own petard. As to the possibility of actual conviction, let's hope so.
Jul 28, 2022 at 11:20 comment added Lag I don't see the relevance of "injustices of unequal bargaining power." The hoaxer set out to convince people of the commission of a theft and subsequently fails to unconvince them. If the court is persuaded beyond reasonable doubt the hoaxer committed the theft, why wouldn't the hoaxer be convicted? The court is not psychic.
Jul 28, 2022 at 7:34 history asked The_Sympathizer CC BY-SA 4.0