Skip to main content
edited body; added 1 character in body
Source Link
Dale M
  • 226.6k
  • 17
  • 262
  • 519

To be valid, a point of order generally needs to be made at the time of the possible Rules violation

Exceptions are where the Rules violation violates the law, where it conflicts with a previously adopted motion (other than a motion to refundrescind that earlier motion), or where it violates a fundamental principle.

Assuming your example doesn’t do any of those things, then the point of order is moot once the vote has been taken.

To be valid, a point of order generally needs to be made at the time of the possible Rules violation

Exceptions are where the Rules violation violates the law, where it conflicts with a previously adopted motion (other than a motion to refund that earlier motion), or where it violates a fundamental principle.

Assuming your example doesn’t do any of those things, then the point of order is moot once the vote has been taken.

To be valid, a point of order generally needs to be made at the time of the possible Rules violation

Exceptions are where the Rules violation violates the law, where it conflicts with a previously adopted motion (other than a motion to rescind that earlier motion), or where it violates a fundamental principle.

Assuming your example doesn’t do any of those things, then the point of order is moot once the vote has been taken.

Source Link
Dale M
  • 226.6k
  • 17
  • 262
  • 519

To be valid, a point of order generally needs to be made at the time of the possible Rules violation

Exceptions are where the Rules violation violates the law, where it conflicts with a previously adopted motion (other than a motion to refund that earlier motion), or where it violates a fundamental principle.

Assuming your example doesn’t do any of those things, then the point of order is moot once the vote has been taken.