Timeline for Is there criminal or civil liability for sabotaging or lying about the use of contraception, which then results in a pregnancy?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2022 at 14:14 | history | edited | Jen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
quoted a paragraph that relates to various comments below
|
| Dec 16, 2022 at 22:34 | comment | added | Chuu | @Bakuriu The idea that the consequences of a control system failing shouldn't be considered a risk because it was likely to happen anyways without the control system in place is just nonsensical. | |
| Dec 16, 2022 at 11:10 | history | edited | Jen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Dec 16, 2022 at 7:05 | comment | added | Bakuriu | @JonathanReez I believe there is a huge difference between the two: condoms not only prevent pregnancies but they also prevent STDs. So not using it adds a huge number of possible negative consequences to the sexual act. Birthcontrol does only that. So the point here is that if you decided to have sex with a protection against STDs, removing it does change the risk-assessment of the act. Pregnancy is a natural part of having sex and arguably isn't really a risk (except for woman in certain cases). | |
| Dec 16, 2022 at 3:39 | history | edited | Jen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Dec 16, 2022 at 3:09 | history | edited | Jen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 5 characters in body
|
| Dec 16, 2022 at 2:47 | history | edited | Jen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 5 characters in body
|
| Dec 16, 2022 at 2:24 | history | edited | Jen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
There are two paths.
|
| Dec 16, 2022 at 1:24 | history | edited | Jen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
| Dec 16, 2022 at 0:25 | history | edited | Jen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Dec 16, 2022 at 0:17 | history | edited | Jen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 282 characters in body
|
| Dec 15, 2022 at 23:47 | comment | added | kaya3 | Since the ruling in Kirkpatrick concerns "birth control methods", would this ruling not apply to deception about the use of a condom as protection against STDs, in circumstances where pregnancy is not a possible outcome (e.g. between gay men)? Or is the term "birth control measures" here meant in a more general sense that includes condoms even when not used for contraceptive purposes? | |
| Dec 15, 2022 at 23:13 | history | edited | Jen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 106 characters in body
|
| Dec 15, 2022 at 22:57 | comment | added | JonathanReez | I'd note that it seems like the court ruled in a one-sided manner: not using a condom would be sexual assault but not using birth control would not be. | |
| Dec 15, 2022 at 15:59 | history | edited | Jen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
| Dec 15, 2022 at 15:26 | history | edited | Jen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 56 characters in body
|
| Dec 15, 2022 at 15:14 | history | edited | Jen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 44 characters in body
|
| Dec 15, 2022 at 15:08 | history | edited | Jen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 44 characters in body
|
| Dec 15, 2022 at 15:03 | history | answered | Jen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |