Timeline for What is the legal status of the accusations on Pakistan by Bangladesh?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Feb 18, 2023 at 16:01 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Feb 18, 2023 at 16:01 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| Feb 14, 2023 at 20:18 | answer | added | Velma | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 10, 2023 at 14:32 | history | edited | user366312 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
| S Feb 10, 2023 at 14:31 | history | bounty started | user366312 | ||
| S Feb 10, 2023 at 14:31 | history | notice added | user366312 | Draw attention | |
| Feb 9, 2023 at 0:24 | history | edited | user366312 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 216 characters in body
|
| Feb 8, 2023 at 23:53 | comment | added | ohwilleke | It isn't obvious to me that a demand for an apology is relief that a court can grant, or that a court can make a finding of fact that a genocide did or did not happen unless it is in furtherance of relief that a court can grant. It sounds to me like a non-justiciable question. But, maybe I'm missing some particular treaty obligation that changes that analysis. Normally, a country can't sue for declaratory or injunctive relief on a defamation claim. | |
| Feb 8, 2023 at 21:18 | answer | added | user6726 | timeline score: 3 | |
| Feb 8, 2023 at 20:27 | answer | added | Dale M♦ | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 8, 2023 at 14:29 | history | edited | user366312 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 63 characters in body
|
| Feb 8, 2023 at 13:33 | history | edited | user366312 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 138 characters in body
|
| Feb 8, 2023 at 13:28 | review | Close votes | |||
| Feb 10, 2023 at 14:34 | |||||
| Feb 8, 2023 at 13:10 | history | edited | user366312 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 101 characters in body
|
| Feb 8, 2023 at 13:02 | history | asked | user366312 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |