Timeline for Is there any difference in meaning between the Boost and MIT software licenses?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2018 at 7:40 | answer | added | cnst | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 9, 2017 at 18:29 | comment | added | Blaisorblade | FWIW, Boost provides a rationale for their license: boost.org/users/license.html#Rationale | |
| Jun 23, 2015 at 8:53 | vote | accept | OMGtechy | ||
| Jun 23, 2015 at 8:48 | answer | added | Mark | timeline score: 17 | |
| May 27, 2015 at 20:35 | review | Close votes | |||
| May 28, 2015 at 2:27 | |||||
| May 27, 2015 at 20:32 | comment | added | Petr Hudeček | There are also other, subtle, changes that may or may not cause any difference; for example, the lists of granted rights are different, and Boost refers to "persons or organizations/third-parties" while MIT refers only to "persons". | |
| May 27, 2015 at 10:14 | review | First posts | |||
| May 27, 2015 at 20:17 | |||||
| May 27, 2015 at 10:10 | history | asked | OMGtechy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |