Timeline for Why did CJ Roberts apply the Fourteenth Amendment to Harvard, a private school?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2023 at 17:15 | comment | added | Very Tiny Brain | I wish that Chief Justice Roberts had been a little clearer with his language. Many news outlets are reporting that he declared Harvard's affirmative action policy to be "unconstitutional". While this claim is perhaps technically correct, it gives the misleading impression that the only way to reverse the Court's ruling would be to amend the Constitution. But in fact, Harvard's policy could be legalized "merely" through legislation that amends Title VI - still a very high hurdle, but much lower than a Constitutional amendment. | |
| Jul 3, 2023 at 11:56 | vote | accept | Very Tiny Brain | ||
| Jul 3, 2023 at 0:36 | history | edited | Jen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Jul 3, 2023 at 0:23 | history | edited | Jen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Jul 2, 2023 at 23:59 | history | edited | Jen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 12 characters in body
|
| Jul 2, 2023 at 23:06 | history | edited | Jen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 52 characters in body
|
| Jul 2, 2023 at 22:12 | history | edited | Jen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Jul 2, 2023 at 20:09 | history | edited | Jen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 642 characters in body
|
| Jul 2, 2023 at 16:23 | history | edited | Jen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 657 characters in body
|
| Jul 2, 2023 at 16:13 | history | answered | Jen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |