Timeline for Would this YouTuber potentially be in legal trouble for filming in a public place?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 28 at 18:56 | history | edited | TylerDurden |
edited tags
|
|
Jan 23 at 23:49 | answer | added | TylerDurden | timeline score: 2 | |
Jan 23 at 19:58 | comment | added | Dale M♦ | This has made the (news)[news.com.au/travel/travel-updates/incidents/…. The barrister they quote says it’s fine. | |
Jan 22 at 10:28 | comment | added | Lag | To me it looks like St Pancras railway station, in case it makes a difference. Neither malls nor stations are 'public' places in this context. | |
Jan 22 at 10:16 | answer | added | Trish | timeline score: 0 | |
Jan 22 at 10:10 | history | edited | Trish |
edited tags
|
|
Jan 22 at 7:58 | comment | added | phoog | Were the objectors present before the recording began, or did they arrive afterwards? Separately, the fact that the objectors were from China seems irrelevant to the legal analysis, though it could certainly explain why they might have different expectations about the law. Furthermore, I would say that you can presume that carrying a Chinese flag is not conclusive. | |
Jan 22 at 6:51 | answer | added | Dale M♦ | timeline score: -4 | |
Jan 22 at 6:28 | history | edited | H2ONaCl | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 7 characters in body
|
Jan 22 at 6:09 | history | asked | H2ONaCl | CC BY-SA 4.0 |