Does a US city have the legal power to stop spam mail?

Question

I live in a small apartment building that gets an onslaught of spam mail. Endless offers and coupon newspapers, etc all addressed to "To the resident of so and so". I, as a concerned and annoyed citizen, wish that this spam mail would stop because it it a waste of resources and a nuisance for me. As a hypothetical question, can a city create a law that prevents spam mail from being sent to their residents? Perhaps a small fine for every spam letter sent? Let's ignore the question of "What defines spam mail?" for now. I am more interested in if a US city has the power to implement such a law.

To be clear, this is not asking how I can avoid spam mail — I am asking whether a municipality has the power to make a law regulating spam mail.

Answer 1

No.

The federal government has essentially exclusive jurisdiction over the question of what may or may not be sent through USPS. Pensacola Tel. Co. v. West., Etc. Tel. Co., 96 U.S. 1, 9 (1877) (“It is not only the right, but the duty, of Congress to see to it that intercourse among the States and the transmission of intelligence are not obstructed or unnecessarily encumbered by State legislation.”).

Answer 2

No

australia

Local government powers are spelled out in the relevant acts of the relevant state or territory governments. AFAIK, none have given them the power to regulate post.

In theory, a state government could give them that power or regulate it themselves, but post and telecommunications is an enumerated power of the Commonwealth, which means that if any of their regulations conflicted with Federal law they would be invalid.

In particular, they can’t impose any regulations on Australia Post, the Commonwealth statutory corporation responsible for delivering letters, which has a large and very profitable direct marketing delivery business. They could still regulate private actors but I think they take the sensible attitude of why bother?

The Federal government could impose such regulations and has a ministry responsible for doing so. While they have imposed anti-spam restrictions on electronic marketing, they have not on post marketing because they believe that the cost falls mainly on the marketer in the first instance but mainly on the consumer in the second.

I challenge your assertion that it is a “waste of resources”. The marketers are clearly happy to invest time and money in these campaigns, so they clearly believe the benefit outweighs the cost — they may not benefit you, but they benefit enough people that the marketer has a positive return on their investment.

Also “inconvenience” is really not a basis for government regulation. It’s only when the actions of others rise to the level of actual harm that government intervention, through regulation or the courts, is warranted.

Answer 3

No in germany, that's a matter of federal law

Postal services are only legislated on the federal level, the city can not make an ordinance.

For leaflets delivered by someone else than the postal service, the Sticker "Please no Ads" came up to the highest German court, the BGH. In AZ VI ZR 182/88 it was found to add leaflets to a postage box that has such a sticker is a violation of personality rights. Note that the argumentation was based on a bunch of BGB paragraphs (§ 823 Abs. 1 i. V. m. § 1004 BGB bzw. 903, 1004, 862 BGB): the Federal German Civil Code.

Due to federal law existing in the matter, there can't be a state or city law. As such, towns are barred because there is preempting higher law.