-2

What method(s) would law enforcement / spy agencies use to get intelligence or information or evidence if they were not allowed to spy on every citizen by listening in on calls and reading emails?

closed as too broad by Pat W., Mark, Zizouz212, Nate Eldredge, jimsug Jun 21 '16 at 7:46

Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 2
    I'm not sure this is on-topic at Law. Your question is essentially, "How does law enforcement and intelligence gathering work without access to wiretaps?" There may not be a stack exchange ideally suited to the question, but perhaps you'd get illuminating answers on History. – feetwet Jun 11 '16 at 18:08
  • 2
    How it was done before the internet? – Agent_L Jun 13 '16 at 10:12
  • @Agent_L that is a question for History. – user3851 Jun 13 '16 at 17:31
2

Some very high level people in several law enforcement / spy agencies have already said that it is impossible to catch anyone if information against everybody is collected, because they would be swamped with so much information that filtering out anything useful is completely impossible. So it's quite the opposite of your question.

And what methods would they used if they were not allowed to illegally spy on everyone? Whatever is legal, just as they do now. Undercover work, appealing to concerned citizens who have information. Education to destroy the basis of terrorism. Being intelligent. You don't stop terrorism by catching terrorists. You stop terrorism by stopping people from wanting to be terrorists.

1

In fact, they are currently not allowed to spy on every citizen by listening in on calls and reading emails. The federal wiretapping law 18 USC 2511 limits that power. This is not to say that the existing broad power is justified, so one might revise that law to make it more difficult for agencies to engage in wiretapping. You could simply massively simplify the law and make all interceptions subject to two-party consent.

Supposing that you did this, it would still be legal to use information reported by individuals; you could still take note of the comings and goings of individuals coming into the country. There are very many law-enforcement tools that are used to catch criminals and terrorists, and it doesn't just rely on wiretapping.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.