At the season finale of Better Call Saul: Season 2. Chuck records Jimmy admitting to committing a felony. The recording was obtained without Jimmy's permission (the tape recorder was hidden). Wouldn't this recording be inadmissible in court as it violates the wire tap law?

  • Is this a telephone conversation or a face-to-face conversation? More specifically, is the recording device operating by taking signals off the wire or by recording sounds from the air? – Patrick Conheady Jun 24 '16 at 14:03
  • @PatrickConheady The tape recorder is recording sounds from the air, a face-to-face conversation. – Dan Jun 24 '16 at 14:44

Better Call Saul is set in New Mexico where as long as one-person involved in the conversation is aware that it is being recorded, it is legal. Known as "one-party consent". This varies state to state.



If neither Jimmy nor Chuck knew the conversation was being recorded, then it would be illegal.

  • Do these laws apply to face-to-face conversations as opposed to telephone/electronic communications? The New Mexico law cited at those links (s 30-12-1) relates only to electronic communications and interception involving interference with an electronic signal in transit, not the recording of sound from the air. – Patrick Conheady Jun 26 '16 at 21:50

It turns out that TV is not entirely faithful to reality, so plot development may explain something. I don't know where the calls were made from and to, but if both parties are in New Mexico, the recording is legal, since New Mexico is a 1-party consent state. If either party is in California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania or Washington, then there could be a two-party consent issue. So I would check the assumption that the recording violates a wiretap law.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.