0

My partner and I created a pre-employment testing website. Users come to our site, pick and choose questions they like from our library and then invite their candidates to take the test.

We (owners of the website) own the copyright to questions in our library. We would now like to limit/reduce/slow down sharing of the answers to our questions. To do that, we have stated in site's terms of service that we own the copyright to the solutions created by candidates.

When a candidate leaks their solutions online (mostly unintentionally), we would like to use these grounds to get the answer removed from the Web (DMCA take down notices) where it's possible to do that.

Is there any legal reason why we are not allowed to do this?

EDIT: Our knowledge of legal systems is very limited and some of the first attempts we tried so far resulted with statements that are putting in question our right to claim ownership over user-generated content so we wanted to quickly check if we are doing something obviously wrong.

EDIT #2: I would appreciate a recommendation for an ideally online law service that could help us sort this out (Terms of service that candidates need to agree to before taking the test) so that it's legally defensible.

  • What reason do you have to believe it would not be legal? – feetwet Jul 25 '16 at 13:33
  • I know of at least one court case in which the offending party was liable to lose of income due to compromising employment test questions. – user3270 Jul 25 '16 at 17:24
  • @mario I've noticed that you've been creating multiple accounts to edit your question. You can ask for the accounts to be merged by clicking the "Contact Us" link at the bottom of the page. – Zizouz212 Jul 26 '16 at 14:17
1

"we have stated in site's terms of service that we own the copyright to the solutions created by candidates".

Well, you can't assign copyright to yourself like that. The default legal position is that the author of a copyrightable work owns the initial copyright. The chief exception is a work for hire, and that's obviously not the case here.

However, I think your problem is fixable. Copyrights can be transferred, certainly in exchange for consideration. Consideration in general can be money, or anything else that's of value to the receiving party. In this case, you will promise the candidates to review their contributions and then submit them to potential employers. As the candidates would like to be employed, you definitely provide a service to them, so you can have legal wording drafted to achieve the intended effect. Getting the i's dotted and t's crossed would be a lawyers job, but it helps to know what to ask.

  • 1
    You don't need consideration to transfer copyright. Copyright can be transferred "in whole or in part by any means of conveyance", but "is not valid unless an instrument of conveyance, or a note or memorandum of the transfer, is in writing and signed by the owner of the rights conveyed or such owner’s duly authorized agent". (There is another way, "operation of law", which applies to cases like companies being bought, or estate transfer, etc.) But you are correct that you can't simply assert copyright ownership. – user3851 Jul 25 '16 at 20:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.