The swamp buster law says that you can't remove trees, or stumps from a wetland. Does that include removing trees that are unproductive for trees that are productive (for food, and other things)?

1 Answer 1


Guilt is a concept of criminal law. In this case, if you do the prohibited thing, you are ineligible for certain USDA benefits. Under 7 CFR 12.4(a)(2-3), triggers include producing an agricultural commodity on a wetland converted after 12/23/85, or after 10/28/90 "converting" a wetland including removing woody vegetation to enable agriculture. Paragraph (c) also says that the loss of eligibility lasts until the situation is rectified (replanting could constitute remediation). 12.5(b) covers exemptions for "prior-converted cropland" which is a special case or a "farmed wetland", and within that a chunk of interest is

(iv) NRCS has determined that the conversion if[sic] for a purpose that does not make the production of an agricultural commodity possible, such as conversions for fish production, trees, vineyards, shrubs, cranberries, agricultural waste management structures, livestock ponds, fire control, or building and road construction and no agricultural commodity is produced on such land

Under these regulations, "agricultural commodity" does not refer to agricultural commodities, it refers to "any crop planted and produced by annual tilling of the soil, including tilling by one-trip planters, or sugarcane", thus pulling out cottonwood trees and planting almond trees would not be producing an agricultural commodity.

There is also a "may I please" option, an exemption if

(v) NRCS has determined that the actions of the person...would have only a minimal effect on the wetland functions and values of wetlands in the area

There are dozens of other possibly applicable conditions which I'll skip. From what I can tell, there is no provision that allows "trade X for Y", but such an action might be consistent with benefit eligibility either under the theory that the "damage" was undone, or else under a "negligible effect" provision.

  • So digging holes, and putting free range chicken coops on the land would work? That's what I was wondering about.
    – person
    Jul 27, 2016 at 0:58
  • 1
    As I read it, the Swampbuster provisions address annual tilled crops. Not applicable to chickens in a normal summer. I don't see how that would make an agricultural commodity possible.
    – user6726
    Jul 27, 2016 at 1:15
  • 1
    I don't want to imply that there are no restrictions on chicken coops in proximity to wetlands, just that Swampbuster doesn't appear to be one.
    – user6726
    Jul 27, 2016 at 1:27
  • Chickens produce eggs, that's a crop. Free range chickens also keep grass down well in an orchard also. If you're building a farm, you need to look into what you can grow where, so having chickens will be like professional lawn mower slaves >:D.
    – person
    Jul 27, 2016 at 1:51

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .