Can I sue from California, in small claim court, someone in England who is British?
I live in California and this guy sometimes comes to CA for business. He stole money from me in the U.S.
Law Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for legal professionals, students, and others with experience or interest in law. It only takes a minute to sign up.Sign up to join this community
In California, the small claims court has jurisdiction over claims up to $10,000. In order to have personal jurisdiction over him:
He must have a summons and complaint hand delivered to him (or to certain other people such as an adult who lives in his household, or to his secretary if he has one). This is called "service of process" and there are professionals called "process servers" who can do this for you in most cities. The service of process can take place anywhere in the world and still be valid. The summons and complaint must be hand delivered by a person over the age of eighteen who is not a party to the lawsuit and is not your attorney.
The events that form the basis of the lawsuit must have happened in California, not merely the United States (long arm personal jurisdiction), or he must have the summons and complaint personally hand delivered to him in the State of California (tag jurisdiction).
If you win, either by default if he fails to respond by the deadline, or following a trial, you will get a piece of paper called a judgment that legally determines that he owes you $X, which you must then enforce. A judgment can be enforced, for example, by garnishing his bank accounts, garnishing monies due to him from an employer or from a sole proprietorship he operates, seizing tangible personal property that he owns with the assistance of a sheriff, or putting a lien on real estate he owns.
A judgment from a California small claims court can only be enforced against assets in California. There is a relatively simple process for having a judgment from California turned into a judgment from any other U.S. state. There is a relatively difficult and expensive process for having a judgment from California turned into a judgment from England that only sometimes works because some aspects of the U.S. civil court system (like punitive damages) are considered to be against public policy in England and are thus not enforceable there.
You cannot have someone arrested for failure to pay a civil judgment.
Enforcing the judgment is likely to be much more difficult than getting the judgment in your case.
It is also possible to make a criminal complaint if the acts genuinely constitute theft. If a prosecutor finds that there is probable cause to back up your claim, the prosecutor could obtain an arrest warrant from the court in the place where the theft took place and that could be served within California when the individual is present in California (i.e., he could be arrested in California, after which the criminal justice process would proceed).
Generally, to constitute theft, it must be intentional and must not be a mere breach of an agreement, in which case it is a breach of contract rather than theft.
Any theft small enough to be addressed in small claims court would probably not be considered serious enough for the government to request extradition from the U.K. for, a step usually reserved for serious felonies, but if extradiction was sought from the U.K., the process on the U.K. side is described here. Any extradiction request would be handled by the prosecutor's office and law enforcement, in cooperation with federal law enforcement agencies.
First of all, I don't know of any restriction in UK procedural law that would prevent a US resident from filing suit in the UK. However, this doesn't neccessarily mean you can sue there (or that you should) because it's a bit more complicated than that.
Do you have a contract with that person? If yes, does it include a forum selection clause?
If there is a forum selection clause in the contract, you need to sue in that jurisdiction.
If not, jurisdiction will depend on the details of your case; There are scenarios where you can only sue in one specific jurisdiction and there are scenarios where you can choose. As I know very little about your case, I can't tell whether that's the case or not.
So if only one jurisdiction has jurisdiction, you need to sue there.
Once you have a judgement, you will want to have it enforced. That is, you will probably want to seize his bank accounts, his gold bars and receivables owed to him by his customers. Where are those located? If the assets in question are located in a jurisdiction other than where you sued, you will need to have the judgement domesticated in that jurisdiction. Domesticating a foreign judgement can be expensive; Therefore, if you can choose where to file suit, sue in the same jurisdiction where the assets are.
If it looks like you can't avoid cross-border enforcement of a judgement, you should try to figure how much it will cost you to enforce the judgement cross-border. Fortunately, the US and the UK share the same language (so you don't have to pay for translations which is usually the most expensive part in international cases) and it looks like you're trying to do this without a lawyer (many people recommend against this, but it can still save you money because in common law jurisdictions, lawyers are very expensive); On top of that, the two legal systems are quite similar. Therefore, we can expect cross-border enforcement (should it be neccessary) to be much cheaper than usual. Still you should try figuring out how much it will cost you and if the figure is too high, you should consider to write down your receivable or find a way to get around cross-border enforcement.