0

What type of irreconcilable differences might exist between an attorney and client to cause the attorney to withdraw from a divorce case? Is this code language for not paying attorney fees or is it used for a wide range of possible attorney-client difficulties?

  • 1
    "irreconcilable differences" is a phrase typically used to describe the marital relationship between the divorcing spouses. It is not typically used to describe the relationship between an attorney and a client. – phoog Dec 20 '16 at 22:39
  • 2
    @phoog. A quick web search turned up these sites, among many, that talk about irreconcilable differences between attorney and client: dcbar.org/bar-resources/legal-ethics/amended-rules/rule1-16.cfm. and. mass.gov/obcbbo/withdraw.htm – user3270 Dec 20 '16 at 22:51
  • It's clear from the context there that the contemplated situation is one in which the client has asked the lawyer to act unethically, but the lawyer cannot explain the unethical request without divulging confidential information. But beyond that, irreconcilable differences means little more than its plain English meaning: a conflict that cannot be resolved. – phoog Dec 20 '16 at 22:55
  • @phoog. Is this term also used for non-payment for the attorney's time spent on the case? – user3270 Dec 20 '16 at 23:01
  • I don't know. I expect that nonpayment would possibly come under "deterioration of the attorney-client relationship," but that's just a guess. I wouldn't be surprised if there are more specific ethics rules describing cases of nonpayment, though a quick look at the DC bar pages didn't reveal any such rules. – phoog Dec 20 '16 at 23:05
7

Comments here and here suggest that "irreconcilable differences" can be used to explain "withdrawal when the client fails to compensate the attorney", but it can mean many other things. The point of the phrase is to not divulge the reason.

Amidst the various scenarios discussed under Rule 1.16(b), subsections (3) and (4) permit withdrawal when the client fails to compensate the attorney [...]

When it comes time for an attorney to prepare the motion for withdrawal for such reasons, however, [...] an attorney may consider citing the ubiquitous “irreconcilable differences” in the motion to withdraw, rather than divulging pernicious information about the client.

However, it can mean many other things as well. The point of the phrase is to not divulge the reason for withdrawal.

  • 1
    One of the possible reasons is "the client told me he is guilty, and I cannot properly continue this defence". It is obviously wrong to divulge this reason, so having a wide category like 'irreconcilable differences' is not only useful but necessary – Tim Lymington Apr 8 '17 at 11:15
3

Don't assume that it is "code" for anything in particular: it just means that they can't work together for any number of reasons.

Perhaps it is a dispute about money, perhaps it is a professional disagreement (i.e. The client won't agree with the professional advice) or perhaps it is personal (i.e. They hate each other).

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.