2

Canary Wharf in London is a privately owned public space.

So far I have been found guilty of walking on a grass and jumping on a stone wall (part of a workout routine).

I'm concerned that sooner or later my attitude don't give a f•••ism will get me banned from the area. I don't the current abilities of the mass surveillance but I could potentially circumvent that with baseball cap and pollution mask.

Jokes aside:

  • do they - http://group.canarywharf.com/about-us/ - have authority over a sovereign man?
  • what if it is their private land?
  • what if it is a public space on their private land?
  • what exactly their private security is entitled to do?

Below attaching screenshot from Google search - some people get frustrated. Before I cross the line I would like to know exactly what my options are.

enter image description here

  • We cannot offer you advice on whether or not a particular action is legal - you have to consult a lawyer for that. You might be able to rephrase your question to ask instead about general legal principles, but do not rely on anything you read here in evaluating the potential legal consequences of any specific actions you might take. – Nate Eldredge Apr 17 '17 at 23:39
  • 3
    Also, can you clarify what you mean by "sovereign man"? If you are referring to a "sovereign citizen" type of theory, you are likely to get a lot of answers pointing out that such theories are junk; see law.stackexchange.com/questions/35/… – Nate Eldredge Apr 17 '17 at 23:40
  • @NateEldredge sovereign man - very interesting link, thank you! – Michael Freeman Apr 18 '17 at 9:23
  • 'what exactly their private security is entitled to do?' Very difficult to say as in these privately owned public space cases the owner has generally been allowed to keep the rules secret. As I live close by, I will irritate the MP for the area about this. – nsandersen Oct 28 '17 at 12:55
  • 1
    @NateEldredge there is no sovereign man in the UK - only a sovereign woman, her name is Elizabeth Windsor – Dale M Jan 17 at 14:16
3

Let's deal with the somewhat misguided notion of "public space": what it means and what it doesn't:

  • "publicly owned" is not equivalent to "public space" - No 10 Downing Street is "publicly owned"; it is not "public space".
  • "privately owned" can be "public space" - the publically accessible parts of shopping malls are privately owned public spaces.
  • "public space" does not mean you have unconditional access. Access may be limited or subject to restrictions placed on it by whoever has lawful authority over it. For example, the aforementioned shopping mall is not public when the mall is closed, roads may be closed for maintenance, street festivities or emergencies etc.

So, people with legal authority over the space can restrict or ban your access if, for example, you repeatedly flaunt the rules that they impose on the space.

Their private security can request that you leave. If you refuse, you are trespassing and subject to arrest, either by security as a citizens arrest or by the police.

  • It might be worth adding something about highways - many of the places where there are extensive rights for members of the public are highways. – bdsl Apr 18 '17 at 7:09
  • 2
    'subject to arrest' may be wrong. Tresspas is not ordinarily a crime in England. – bdsl Apr 18 '17 at 7:11
  • citizen's arrest - interesting concept - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizen%27s_arrest – Michael Freeman Apr 18 '17 at 9:21
0

If you are banned from entering that land in writing then under common law, you are banned from entering that land whilst the ban remains in force. Ignoring that ban could lead to a civil action or even a criminal prosecution against you. A civil action could lead to an injunction being made prohibiting you from entering the land, breach of which will constitute a contempt of court for which you could be fined and/or imprisoned. A criminal prosecution could be made for aggravated trespass, if found guilty for that offence then you could be fined and/or imprisoned. In addition to that, if an application is made by the prosecutor, then the court could consider making a Criminal Behaviour Order against you which would last for a minimum of two years and is unlimited in length. If you breach this order and are subsequently found guilty, then the maximum sentence you could face would be 5 years imprisonment and/or an unlimited fine. I would advise speaking to a civil solicitor if you still wish to trespass on that land.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.